Georgia court sets October date for Trump challenge to Fani Willis, likely delaying trial past election

Appeals court will hear Trump’s attempt to disqualify Fulton County prosecutor from election interference case

Alex Woodward
Monday 03 June 2024 22:11 BST
Comments
Related video: Fani Willis accuses prosecution of ‘lying’ as she takes stand

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

An appeals court in Georgia has scheduled a hearing on Donald Trump’s renewed push to disqualify Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from trying the former president and his allies in a wide-ranging election interference case.

A panel of appellate court judges will hear their appeal on October 4 – one month and one day before the presidential election.

The judge overseeing the election interference case against the former president and his co-defendants has allowed Willis to stay on, following lengthy court hearings in March to determine whether she financially benefited from hiring a special prosecutor with whom she was once romantically involved.

Trump and his co-defendants then appealed that decision, and it has landed on the court calendar on October 4.

Judges Trent Brown, Todd Markle and Benjamin Land are expected to hear the case, but they also could decide against holding oral arguments and rule on the matter based on briefs filed to the court. Those briefs are due later this month.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee hasn’t paused pretrial proceedings in the initial case, but the case will not be going to trial until this issue is resolved – meaning, it is unlikely that the trial to determine if Trump interfered in the 2020 election will reach a verdict before the next one.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. (AP)

Willis and now-former special prosecutor Nathan Wade acknowledged their prior relationship but repeatedly testified that they started dating after he was hired, split their expenses, and that the relationship ended last summer before an indictment.

Judge McAfee’s decision offered her a choice: she can remove herself from the case, along with her entire office, or Wade can step aside. Hours later, Wade submitted his letter of resignation.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee. (AP)

The case against the former president and five of his co-defendants surrounds an alleged pressure campaign to solicit state officials to violate their oaths of office and subvert Georgia’s election results to overturn his 2020 presidential election loss in the state.

They are accused of mounting a so-called “fake elector” scheme to falsely assert his victory in a state he lost to Joe Biden, seizing voting machines, intimidating election workers, and pushing the state’s top election official to “find” votes he would need to win.

All have pleaded not guilty.

Four of Mr Trump’s original co-defendants in the Fulton County case – including attorneys Kenneth Chesebro, Jenna Ellis and Sidney Powell – pleaded guilty last year after reaching plea deals with prosecutors.

The appeals court hearing date was first reported by The Atlanta-Journal Constitution.

“We look forward to presenting argument before [the panel] on why this case should be dismissed and Fulton County DA Willis should be disqualified for the trial court’s acknowledged ‘odor of mendacity’ misconduct in violation of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct,” Trump attorney Steve Sadow said in a statement.

The hearing date marks a legal win for the former president, who is unlikely to face another trial before Election Day after a jury in New York convicted him on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records on May 30.

A decision from the US Supreme Court on whether he has “immunity” from charges in his federal election interference case could be imminent, but that case is unlikely to head to a trial before Election Day.

The Trump-appointed federal judge presiding over his case involving the retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago compound also indefinitely delayed that trial after vacating an initial May trial date.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in