Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

‘Insane’ plan for fake Trump electors to hide in Michigan Capitol overnight revealed at Jan 6 hearings

‘Republican electors were planning to meet in the capitol and hide overnight so that they could fulfil the role of casting their vote, per law, in the Michigan chambers’

Gustaf Kilander
Washington, DC
Tuesday 21 June 2022 15:05 EDT
Comments
Related video: ‘The lie hasn’t gone away’: Jan 6 committee chairman says Trump threat to elections is ongoing

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A group of fake Michigan electors who said they worked for the Trump campaign planned to hide out in the state Capitol overnight in order to cast electoral votes for the former president, according to testimony from a hearing of the January 6 House Select Committee.

The committee said that since the scheme involved fake electors, those taking part in some states had no way of following state election laws, such as being in the state capitol to cast their votes.

One group of fake electors considered hiding in the capitol overnight to ensure that they had access to the building, which is required in Michigan.

Laura Cox, the former Michigan Republican Party Chair, told the committee during a pre-recorded deposition that she was told that the “Michigan Republican electors were planning to meet in the Capitol and hide overnight so that they could fulfil the role of casting their vote, per law, in the Michigan chambers”.

Ms Cox said she responded that the plan was “insane and inappropriate”.

The committee said that Mr Trump’s own White House office of legal counsel found the scheme of using fake electors to be illegal.

During a pre-recorded deposition, a committee staffer asked a former aide to Trump chief of staff Mike Meadows if she heard the White House Counsel “say that this plan to have alternate electors meet and cast votes for Donald Trump in states that he had lost was not legally sound”.

“Yes,” Cassidy Hutchinson confirmed to the committee, adding that Mr Meadows, Mr Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, and “a few of Mr Giuliani’s associates” were present at that meeting.

The committee obtained an email from two days after the election in which Trump campaign lawyer Cleta Mitchell asked fellow Trump attorney John Eastman: “John – What do you think of producing a legal memo outlining the constitutional role of state legislators in designating electors?”

During a pre-recorded deposition, Ms Mitchell was asked by a House Select Committee staffer when she remembered the strategy coming up for the first time.

“Right after the election. It might have been before the election,” she said.

Mr Eastman wrote a memo outlining the tactic, which was sent to the Trump White House, the legal team of Mr Trump’s then-personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, and state lawmakers.

Mr Eastman also went before the Georgia legislature to push the strategy.

“You could also do what the Florida legislature was prepared to do,” he said on 3 December 2020. “Which is to adopt a slate of electors yourselves.”

He said that because of what he claimed to be evidence of “outright election fraud”, it was not only within their “authority” but that it was their “duty to do that”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in