Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump slams ‘cockroaches’ in DC following release of Durham report

Durham report doesn’t recommend new criminal charges or major changes at FBI

Josh Marcus
San Francisco
Tuesday 16 May 2023 17:46 EDT
Comments
From 'damning' to 'dud': Lawmakers react to Durham report

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump lauded the recently released report from special counsel John Durham regarding the 2016 FBI probe into the Trump campaign for its Russia ties, blasting political enemies as “scum” and “cockroaches all over Washington.”

“The Durham Report spells out in great detail the Democrat Hoax that was perpetrated upon me and the American people,” the former president wrote on Truth Social on Monday, calling it “the Crime of the Century!”

Mr Durham, whose report came out on Monday, was appointed by the Trump administration in 2019 to investigate the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation, which was already scrutinised by a 2019 investigation by the Justice Department’s inspector general.

The Durham report ultimately recommended no new charges and featured information that was already mostly known, failing to uncover the kind of sweeping conspiracy Mr Trump and conservative politicians have alleged was behind the original Russia investigation.

During the four-year special counsel investigation, Mr Durham only brought a few cases, most of which failed. The only conviction so far has been an FBI lawyer, who pleaded guilty to doctoring an email used to secure a surveillance warrant against a former Trump campaign adviser. The plea involved no prison time. Two other cases – one against, Michael Sussman, a lawyer who passed a tip to the FBI about a potential link between Trump and a Russian bank, and another against Igor Danchenko, a researcher behind the Steele dossier – both ended in acquittals.

However, the Durham report was sharply critical of the FBI’s handling of the Trump case, arguing the agency suffered from “confirmation bias” and let “raw, unanalyzed and uncorroborated intelligence” fuel a probe into the Trump campaign.

It faulted the FBI for offering the Clinton campaign a defensive briefing when it suspected a foreign entity of trying to buy influence over the campaign, while not offering similar treatment to the Trump campaign, and the report recommended the FBI create a position to scrutinise and challenge major steps taken in politically sensitive investigations.

The special counsel report acknowledged there was “no question the F.B.I. had an affirmative obligation to closely examine” the Trump campaign in the summer of 2016, after an Australian diplomat tipped off the agency that the campaign seemed to be aware in advance that Russia would released damaging, potentially hacked, info about the Clinton campaign.

A 2019 inspector general report from the DoJ previously investigated the Russia investigation, finding no  “documentary or testimonial evidence of intentional misconduct,” but arguing the FBI failed in handling information used to secure wiretaps, including relying on parts of the Steele dossier even though there were reasons to doubt its credibility.

The FBI said in a statement this week to The Washington Post that the 2019 inspector general report “was the reason that current FBI leadership already implemented dozens of corrective actions, which have now been in place for some time.”

“Had those reforms been in place in 2016, the missteps identified in the report could have been prevented,” it argued. “This report reinforces the importance of ensuring the FBI continues to do its work with the rigor, objectivity, and professionalism the American people deserve and rightly expect.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in