Trump considering avoiding all 2020 election debates with Democrats, reports say
'Not doing any would not be strategically smart,' says longtime Clinton adviser
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump is discussing with his advisers the possibility of sitting out the general election debates in 2020 because of his misgivings about the commission that oversees them, according to two people familiar with the discussions.
They claimed the US president has told advisers that he does not trust the Commission on Presidential Debates, the nonprofit entity that sponsors the debates.
Less of a concern for Mr Trump than who will emerge as the Democratic nominee is which media personality will be chosen as the debate moderator, according to people in contact with him.
At a state-of-the-race campaign briefing in Virginia, the president’s advisers declined to comment on what their plan was for the debates.
One senior adviser to the president seemed to wince at the question and said it was not something they were prepared to discuss until next year.
In the 2016 general election debates, Mr Trump repeatedly complained about being at a disadvantage to Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee. And the post-debate polls showed he had good reason to be concerned: Mr Trump and Ms Clinton were essentially tied in the polls going into the first debate, but she received a bump after each of the three face-to-face matchups.
A Gallup poll conducted after the third debate, for instance, found that 60 per of viewers thought Ms Clinton did a better job, while 31 per cent chose the current president.
After his performance in one of the debates was panned, Mr Trump blamed a “defective mic” and questioned whether it was done “on purpose” to put him at a disadvantage.
It turned out that a technical malfunction had indeed affected the volume of his voice during that debate in September 2016.
That acknowledgement by the commission, however, never mollified Mr Trump.
His 2016 debate team — led primarily at that time by Rudy Giuliani, the former New York City mayor — also clashed with the commission over where to seat a group of women who had accused Bill Clinton, a former president, of sexual assault or sexual harassment.
The Trump campaign invited the women as surprise guests to the second debate in St Louis.
He wanted them seated in his VIP box, where Bill Clinton would have to walk past them; they would also have been in Ms Clinton’s line of site from the stage.
In the end, the campaign had to stand down after the commission threatened to call security and have the women removed.
Former Clinton aides said they expected Mr Trump to participate in at least one 2020 debate, despite the president’s hints that he would refuse.
“Not doing any would not be strategically smart,” said Philippe Reines, a longtime Clinton adviser, who predicted that “he’ll bluff that he won’t do any with the goal of only having to do one”.
The New York Times
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments