Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tennessee drag ban is struck down by federal judge: ‘Unconstitutionally vague and substantially overbroad’

‘Simply put, no majority of the Supreme Court has held that sexually explicit — but not obscene — speech receives less protection than political, artistic, or scientific speech’

Bevan Hurley
Saturday 03 June 2023 10:48 EDT
Comments
Marjorie Taylor Greene's boyfriend wears drag despite her anti-drag stance

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A federal judge has tossed out a controversial Tennessee law that restricted drag performances in a significant win for LGBT+ advocates.

Judge Thomas Parker issued a ruling on Friday night that the law, one of several anti-LGBT+ bills passed by the Republican legislature this year, was “unconstitutionally vague and substantially overbroad.”

“There is no question that obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment,” the Trump-appointed judge wrote.

“But there is a difference between material that is ‘obscene’ in the vernacular, and material that is ‘obscene’ under the law.”

“Simply put, no majority of the Supreme Court has held that sexually explicit — but not obscene — speech receives less protection than political, artistic, or scientific speech.”

In February, Tennessee became the first state to approve restrictions on where drag shows can be performed.

The bill signed into law by Governor Bill Lee effectively banned drag performances on public property or in spaces where minors are present.

It didn’t explicitly mention drag shows, but called for enforcement of “adult-oriented performances that are harmful to minors”. Male or female impersonators could face misdemeanour criminal charges, with repeat offenders facing felonies.

Pageant winners throw out at the Memphis Pride Festival & Parade.
Pageant winners throw out at the Memphis Pride Festival & Parade. (AP)

In March, Memphis-based theatre group Friends of George filed a lawsuit seeking an injunction against the ban, stating on its website that it “imperils the lives of drag performers and seeks to oppress queer culture state-wide”.

The injunction prevented the ban from coming into effect as planned in April.

In his ruling, Judge Parker cited an example of a female performer dressed as Elvis Presley could be at risk of punishment under the law because they would be considered a “male impersonator.”

“We won!” Friends of George declared after the decision was issued.

Advocates celebrated the ruling, which came as the LGBT+ community kicked off Pride Month celebrations across the United States.

“As we always say — Tennessee Republicans don’t pass laws, they pass lawsuits,” the Tennessee Holler wrote on Twitter.

“And just like that, drag remains legal in Tennessee,” civil rights lawyer Melissa Stewart wrote.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in