Syria strikes: US says both chlorine and sarin used in Douma chemical attack
The US and Russia clashed at the UN
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The US has claimed that both sarin and chlorine were used by Syria in an attack that killed dozens of civilians in Douma, an attack America, France and Britain said led them to carry out retaliatory air strikes, but which which the Syrian government denies having a role in.
On Friday night, barely an hour after the multi-nation attacks on three Syrian targets allegedly linked to the production, use and storage of chemical weapons were completed, US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis said the US was certain one deadly compound was used and that there may have been more than one. “We are not clear on that yet. We know at least one chemical agent was used,” he said.
Yet on Saturday, an unidentified US official told the media the US had now assessed that sarin and chlorine were used in the attack in the Damascus suburb of Douma.
“We do have significant information that also points to sarin use,” the official said, citing symptoms described in reporting from media, non-governmental organisations and other open sources, according to CNN. The official apparently provided no other evidence.
“Last night, operations were very successful,” said Pentagon spokesperson Dana White. “We met our objectives. We hit the sites, the heart of the chem-weapons programme. So it was mission accomplished.”
Vice President Mike Pence said the strikes, “degraded and crippled chemical weapons capabilities of Syria”.
“I think the President’s expressions this morning were a strong affirmation that the mission that he gave our military to go in and destroy key elements of the chemical weapons infrastructure in Syria was completely and professionally and swiftly accomplished,” said Mr Pence, who was on a foreign trip to Peru for the Summit of the Americas.
At the UN, US UN Ambassador Nikki Haley said she had spoken earlier in the day to Mr Trump.
“We are confident that we have crippled Syria’s chemical weapons programme. We are prepared to sustain this pressure, if the Syrian regime is foolish enough to test our will,” she said.
“If the Syrian regime uses this poison gas again, the United States is locked and loaded.”
Russia’s UN Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia told the council that the US and its allies struck without waiting for an investigation by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, calling the attack “hooliganism”. “This was blatant disregard for international law,” he said.
The heated words came as official from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons arrived in Syria to carry out an investigation into the incident in Douma, located in eastern Ghouta where the Syrian government recently ousted the final pockets of anti-government rebels.
“The Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) team of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) will continue its deployment to the Syrian Arab Republic to establish facts around the allegations of chemical weapons use in Douma,” the group said, adding on Twitter that its team had arrived in Damascus.
“The OPCW has been working in close collaboration with the United Nations Department of Safety and Security to assess the situation and ensure the safety of the team.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments