Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Read the Supreme Court’s ruling on Trump’s presidential immunity in full

Former presidents have immunity from prosecution for official acts but not unofficial acts, the justices ruled

James Liddell
Monday 01 July 2024 11:49 EDT
Donald Trump has been granted partial immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts
Donald Trump has been granted partial immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts (AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Supreme Court has ruled that Donald Trump, and any future president, has some immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts undertaken as president.

While the nation’s highest court rejected the former president’s suggestion of total immunity, in a 6-3 ruling the justices said that some actions – those deemed official acts – are protected.

Former presidents, however, have no immunity for unofficial acts – or conduct undertaken in private.

“The President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the President does is official. The President is not above the law,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.

In her dissent, liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warned that the ruling “breaks new and dangerous ground”.

The case stems from Trump’s appeal in his federal election interference case brought by special counsel Jack Smith last year, charging the former president over his attempts to overturn the 2020 election result and his role in the January 6 Capitol riot.

Now, the justices’ landmark decision means his federal election interference criminal case will return to a lower court for further legal wranglings, including determining what constitutes an official and unofficial act, leading to further delays.

This now dramatically reduces the likelihood that Trump’s trial will take place before the 2024 presidential election in November.

Trump was quick to share his jubiliation on Truth Social, writing: “Big win for our Constitution and democracy. Proud to be an American.”

Read the full 119-page ruling below:

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in