Ex-Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer says he’s ‘very sorry’ about abortion decision
‘Was I happy about it? Not for an instant’, former Justice Stephen Breyer says
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer expressed regret for the high court’s decision to allow states to force women to carry unwanted pregnancies to term, in his first interview since leaving the bench earlier this year.
Mr Breyer told CNN’s Chris Wallace he is "very, very, very sorry" about the decision, which overturned a half-century of expanded reproductive rights for women.
"Was I happy about it? Not for an instant. Did I do everything I could to persuade people? Of course, of course,” he said in the interview for the former Fox News anchor’s new CNN programme, Who’s Talking to Chris Wallace?
Mr Breyer also said his decision to retire this past June was informed by past Republican obstruction of Democratic presidents’ Supreme Court nominees. He told Mr Wallance that he feared a Republican takeover of the Senate in the 2022 midterm elections would have forced him to remain on the bench because the Senate would have refused to confirm anyone President Joe Biden would nominate to replace him.
"There have been delays, you know, when the party is split between control of the Senate and control of the presidency," he said. "And sometimes, long times pass and I would prefer that my own retirement, my own membership on the court, not get involved in what I call those purely political issues."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments