Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

White House lawyer faces calls to resign after he 'tried to stop Jeff Sessions recusing himself from Russia probe'

The removal calls follow the latest damaging report about Mr Trump's efforts to influence the Department of Justice

Clark Mindock
New York
Friday 05 January 2018 12:19 EST
Comments
Mr McGahn is pictured here leaving the White House during the presidential transition period in 2016
Mr McGahn is pictured here leaving the White House during the presidential transition period in 2016 (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A top House Democrat is calling for the dismissal of the White House counsel Don McGahn over his role in the probe into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election.

Representative Jerrold Nadler called for the dismissal after a report from the New York Times indicated that President Donald Trump ordered Mr McGahn to stop Attorney General Jeff Sessions from recusing himself from the investigation into the meddling.

Mr Nadler, in a statement, said that the order — and Mr McGahn’s decision to follow the directive — amounts to an effort to undermine the Justice Department and its investigation. Mr McGahn’s role as a government employee, Mr Nadler said, does not allow him to act like Mr Trump’s former personal attorney, Roy Cohn.

“Mr. McGahn’s actions under Mr. Trump’s orders in either case would appear to be yet another incident pointing to an overall effort to obstruct and undermine the Department of Justice,” Mr Nadler said. “It is not the duty of the White House Counsel to be the President’s Roy Cohn, as Donald Trump would have it, but to protect and defend the Constitution — which Mr. McGahn seems to be failing to do.”

The New York Times report indicates that Mr Trump instructed his White House counsel to put pressure on Mr Sessions in March, and that Mr McGahn then lobbied the embattled attorney general to stay involved. When Mr McGahn was unsuccessful, Mr Trump reportedly erupted in anger in front of several White House officials, and said he needed his attorney general to protect him.

The episode is one of several previously unreported instances that special counsel Robert Mueller is said to have learned about in the course of his 2016 probe.

Other instances include Mr Trump penning a letter that he intended to deliver to former FBI Director James Comey, who was in charge of the Russia investigation at the time, saying that the investigation was “fabricated and politically motivated”. White House aides intervened, and stopped the letter from being sent.

Another revelation has been that former White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus penned handwritten notes that the President had called Mr Comey to urge him to publicly announce that he wasn’t personally a target in the investigation. The special counsel has reportedly received those notes.

And, in the lead up to Mr Comey’s firing last year — which ultimately resulted in the appointment of Mr Mueller — Mr Trump’s aides reportedly misled him about his ability to fire his FBI director, and one of Mr Sessions’ aides went to congressional staff to ask if they had any damaging information on Mr Comey as they sought to undermine the former FBI director.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in