Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ruling on Ohio ballot boxes contradicts GOP elections chief

A federal judge in Cleveland has broadly interpreted a new Ohio directive allowing ballot drop boxes at locations “outside” boards of elections as permitting them at multiple locations within a county

Via AP news wire
Tuesday 06 October 2020 15:49 EDT

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A federal judge in Cleveland on Tuesday broadly interpreted a new Ohio directive allowing ballot drop boxes at locations “outside” boards of elections as permitting them at multiple locations within a county, a finding that runs directly counter to the intention of the state elections chief.

It was not immediately clear what impact U.S. District Judge Dan Polster's decision would have on the number of drop boxes available across the presidential battleground state ahead of the Nov. 3 election. The judge said the court “fervently hopes” the ruling ends the issue for now.

Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose's latest order, issued Monday, was painted as a “clarification” to the earlier one-box-per-county order that repeatedly had been found unreasonable by the courts.

When pressed by an Associated Press reporter Monday, LaRose's staff said that when he allowed drop boxes “outside a board of elections,” he meant located on board property — and specifically not at other off-site locations, such as libraries. Spokesperson Jon Keeling said the language mirrored a law passed in the spring that established one drop box per county amid the coronavirus pandemic.

Polster was so confident in his interpretation of the directive, however, that he dismissed as moot a complaint brought by the A. Philip Randolph Institute, a voting rights group, seeking additional drop boxes in Cuyahoga County, which is home to the Democratic Party bastion of Cleveland.

“In his latest directive, the Secretary authorized any board to deploy its staff to receive ballots at sites other than the board office,” Polster wrote. “This means that Cuyahoga County may implement its intended plan to receive ballots at six public libraries, and that any other board in Ohio that votes to do so may deploy its staff to receive ballots off-site.”

A message seeking comment was left with LaRose's office.

The wording of LaRose's new directive was problematic virtually as soon as it was issued. An extra drop box that LaRose had approved in Cleveland was located outside and across the street from the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections, but not on its property.

Another election board, in Athens County, told the AP that, under his original order, it needed special permission to set up a second drop box at its back entrance, though it was inside the building.

Polster's ruling came as absentee voting in the state was shaping up to be record-breaking. LaRose's office said nearly 2.2 million absentee ballot applications have been received by Ohio's 88 county election boards. That's nearly twice the number of requests received at this same point in the 2016 election.

Curbside drop boxes have been sought around the country as an alternative to in-person voting complicated by the coronavirus, and mail-in voting has been a subject of concern, particularly after unfounded allegations by Republican President Donald Trump that it is unreliable as a voting method.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in