Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Senator Ron Johnson’s staffer was part of Wisconsin fake elector scheme

Wisconsin senator has distanced himself from scheme

John Bowden
Wednesday 31 August 2022 16:19 EDT
Comments
Ron Johnson booed and heckled at Milwaukee Juneteenth event after delaying bill making it federal holiday

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A woman who was part of an effort to subvert the will of voters in the 2020 election and cast her state’s Electoral College votes for Donald Trump works for the state’s Republican senator, Ron Johnson.

The new revelation was first reported by NBC News on Wednesday. According to the news outlet and a spokesperson for Mr Johnson, the woman in question, Pam Travis, is a longtime state Republican Party operative who works, according to Mr Johnson’s office, “answering phones” in the senator’s regional headquarters.

Ms Travis was one of 10 people who sought to have the state’s legislature endorse their bid to pass a resolution “decertifying” the results of Wisconsin’s 2020 presidential election and supporting their efforts to go to Washington and cast the state’s ballots for Mr Trump instead of Joe Biden. The scheme was unconstitutional for a number of reasons: There’s no legal means, according to experts in Wisconsin law, to throw out the state’s election results with a simple legislative fiat. And no credible authority ever proved any kind of widespread fraud in Wisconsin during the 2020 election.

But nonetheless, the scheme continued for months to the point where the top deputy for Mr Johnson was in contact with a lawyer for the Trump campaign on the morning of January 6 and was pressured (unsuccessfully) to ask his boss to hand-deliver the slate of Wisconsin’s false electors to Mike Pence on the day when those electors would have been counted.

That contact has led to questions about just how involved Mr Johnson and his team were in the efforts around the country by the Trump campaign and the president’s allies to reverse his defeat in key swing states including Wisconsin, Arizona, and Georgia. The senator has denied any significant involvement for months.

A spokesperson for his office slammed the campaign of his Democratic opponent, Mandela Barnes, in a statement when asked for comment on the continued employment of Ms Travis by The Independent, and called her a valued colleague.

“Pam Travis is a dedicated volunteer who has been active in the Republican Party grassroots for years and we are proud to have her on the team. It is really sad that Mandela Barnes supporters are going as low as to levy a baseless attack against a private citizen while Barnes himself dodges media scrutiny on a near-daily basis,” said Alexa Henning.

Numerous Republicans in the House of Representatives are known to have sought pardons for their own roles in the efforts to overturn the 2020 election, as did members of Mr Trump’s inner circle including Rudy Giuliani.

Those discussions as well as the very public efforts of Republicans to back away from their unsuccessful efforts raises the question about how involved they were, and whether they knew from the beginning that their efforts were likely afoul of legal procedures for contesting election results.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in