Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The red states that Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are turning purple in 2016

Three new potential swing states are the result of accelerated demographic trends - and one is a freak occurrence

Tim Walker
US Correspondent
Wednesday 26 October 2016 14:24 EDT
Comments
Trump once said he could put Democratic strongholds such as New York and California in play
Trump once said he could put Democratic strongholds such as New York and California in play (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The 2016 US presidential election is already historic, with Americans about to elect either their first female president, or their first reality television president. But it also has the potential to dramatically redraw the electoral college map.

Donald Trump, the Republican nominee, is attracting support in the so-called Rust Belt, making him a contender in Iowa and Ohio, which in recent years have been key swing states. But, early in his general election campaign, he also promised to put Democratic strongholds such as New York and California in play.

That hasn’t happened. Instead, the property developer has generated unprecedented levels of opposition from minority groups, whose rising political influence has put Republican dominance in doubt in several states, accelerating trends that the GOP establishment has long feared.

Four states in particular epitomise the Trump effect. Georgia, Arizona, Texas and Utah have not voted for a Democratic presidential candidate for at least 20 years – in Utah’s case, it has been more than half a century – but all four are poised to turn purple in 2016.

GEORGIA

Last voted for a Democrat in: 1992, Bill Clinton

RealClearPolitics polling average: Trump +4

Last week, pro-Clinton super-PAC Priorities USA Action made a $2m ad spend in Georgia, which seemed a surprising investment in a southern state that has been solidly red for the past two decades. President Obama lost the Peach State by five points in 2008 and seven points in 2012.

The last Democrat to win there was Hillary Clinton’s husband Bill, by a nose, in 1996. Yet a day after the ad spend was announced, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution released a new state poll showing that the race between Clinton and Trump was within the margin of error.

With the number of non-white voters on the rise in the region, the southeast is slowly moving towards the Democrats. North Carolina voted for Mr Obama in 2008, and is expected to fall into the Clinton column in 2016.

African-Americans comprise 30 per cent of Georgia’s electorate, and 95 per cent of them voted for Obama in 2012. Trump is haemorrhaging support among college-educated white voters in the Atlanta suburbs. If black voters turn out and college-educated white women don’t – or even decide to vote for Clinton – Georgia could swing blue as soon as November.

ARIZONA

Last voted for a Democrat in: 1996, Bill Clinton

RCP Polling average: Clinton +1.5

Arizona has voted for a Democratic presidential candidate just once since 1948. But the Clinton campaign is also making a big ad spend in the Grand Canyon State, where Michelle Obama was sent to campaign on Ms Clinton's behalf last week.

In 2012, Mitt Romney won Arizona by more than nine points. A report released afterwards by Arizona State University researchers suggested it would take until 2030 for its rising Latino population – now between 20 and 25 per cent of eligible voters – to turn the state blue.

But Trump’s anti-immigrant rhetoric has done more to mobilise Hispanic voters than any Democrat, and now the state is a toss-up in 2016. a recent poll for the Arizona Republic found that more than half the border state’s voters opposed his signature policy: a border wall.

Arizona Latino Jose Barboza talks about registering people to vote

In fact, Arizona Latino groups have been organising energetically ever since 2010, when the state’s Republican-controlled legislature passed the controversial Senate Bill 1070 (SB1070), the harshest set of anti-immigration measures anywhere in the US.

The Trump effect may also unseat another Arizona Republican stalwart. Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, a staunch Trump surrogate, was recently charged with criminal contempt for allegedly violating a court’s order that his office desist from racially profiling Latinos.

Arpaio, who is 84 and has been in office since 1993, is running around 15 points behind his opponent.

TEXAS

Last voted for a Democrat in: 1976, Jimmy Carter

RCP Polling average: Trump +4.8

Republicans in the Lone Star State are watching Arizona for signs of what the future may hold, as their own Latino population continues to grow. And while the demographic shift is slow, this election could prove to be an outlier, even in Texas.

In a state that Obama lost twice by more than 10 points, and where Democrats have not won a governor’s race since 1990, some polls put Clinton within the margin of error. An historic turnout of black and Latino voters could hypothetically help her to claim its 38 electoral college votes.

But while Trump was soundly beaten by Ted Cruz in the state’s Republican primary, Texans are unlikely to be broadly well-disposed to an establishment Democrat who so proudly supports gun control and abortion rights.

Texas Democrats, meanwhile, know not to get overly optimistic. Wendy Davis, a Democratic state senator who earned national headlines for her 13-hour filibuster of an anti-abortion bill in 2013, could not translate that enthusiasm into votes when she ran for governor the following year, losing to Republican Greg Abbott by more than 20 points.

UTAH

Last voted for a Democrat in: 1964, Lyndon Johnson

RCP Polling average: Trump +5.5, with Clinton and McMullin tied

Utah, which Romney won by more than 50 points in 2012, is reliably one of the reddest states in the US. So why is Trump’s running mate, Indiana Governor Mike Pence, campaigning there this week when there are so many other battleground states that the Republicans need to win?

While Trump’s candidacy has accelerated existing anti-Republican, demographic trends in Georgia, Arizona and Texas, the threat he faces in the Beehive State is more of a freak occurrence, unique to 2016.

The property developer came in third place in the Utah Republican primary, behind Cruz and John Kasich, with a measly 14 per cent of the vote compared to Cruz’s 69.5 per cent. Two-thirds of Utah’s population is Mormon, and many of its voters are staunch conservatives.

Trump did not impress them during the primaries, particularly when he made personal attacks on his rival’s wife, Heidi Cruz. And when the Access Hollywood tape emerged, in which he bragged of having sexually assaulted women, Utah’s Republican leaders also deserted him.

The GOP nominee has been disavowed by the state’s current governor, Gary Herbert, its former governor, Jon Huntsman, and Utah Congressman Jason Chaffetz, a high-profile Clinton critic. That doesn’t mean they’re voting for Clinton, however.

Instead, many Utahans appear to be supporting a little-known independent candidate: Evan McMullin, a Republican, a Mormon and a former CIA undercover agent running as a “compassionate conservative”, who supports immigration and criminal justice reform.

McMullin, remarkably, is polling close behind Trump in Utah. If he won he would be the first independent presidential candidate to secure any electoral college votes since George Wallace in 1968. Alternatively, he could split the state's Republican vote in half, giving Clinton a slim chance of claiming its six electoral votes.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in