Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

9/11: Republican Rand Paul blocks attempt to permanently fund victims' compensation

Democrats try to approve measure without need for debate or full vote

Andrew Buncombe
Seattle
Wednesday 17 July 2019 16:23 EDT
Comments
Jon Stewart: 'Last week seven first responders died due to 9/11 related illnesses'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Republican senator Rand Paul has blocked an attempt by Democrats to pass legislation that would have permanently provided money to a compensation fund set up to help the victims of the 9/11 attacks.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, one of the two-dozen Democrats seeking the party’s presidential nomination, sought to give the green light to a bill already passed in the House of Representatives, that would have extended funding until the year 2090. That bill was passed last week, 402 – 12.

But according to reports, Mr Paul, the libertarian-minded senator from Kentucky, stepped in to block her effort.

“It has long been my feeling that we need to address our massive debt in the country,” he said, according to The Hill

“And therefore any new spending….should be offset by cutting spending that’s less valuable. We need to at the very least have this debate.”

Ms Gillibrand later responded: “I am deeply disappointed that my colleague has just objected to the desperately needed and urgent bill for our 9/11 first responders.”

Under rules governing the upper chamber of Congress, a single senator can seek approval of a bill that would normally require a full debate and vote.

Jon Stewart receives standing ovation after blasting US congress for 'empty' 9/11 victims hearing

At the same time, a single senator can also object to such as request and block it being given the green light.

The fund was established by Congress in the aftermath of the 2001 Al Qaeda attacks, to pay compensation to the victims and their families. It also established payments for emergency workers who were affected by labouring in perilous and sometimes deadly conditions amid toxic chemicals.

The plight of the emergency workers was recently picked up by comedian Jon Stewart, who appeared on Capitol Hill to urge politicians to find money for the fund.

He said family members wanted to know “why this is so damn hard and takes so damn long”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in