Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Pennsylvania redraws 'unconstitutional' political boundaries in potential boost to Democrats

Amid partisan wrangling, Pennsylvania Supreme Court dictates new boundaries

Jeremy B. White
San Francisco
Monday 19 February 2018 20:33 EST
Comments
People prepare to cast votes in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
People prepare to cast votes in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (REUTERS/Charles Mostoller)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has released a new configuration of Congressional districts which could provide the Democrats with a boost in the upcoming midterm elections.

The reshaping of political boundaries represents the latest phase in a years-long political battle. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that districts crafted by the Republican majority were unconstitutional and sought to give the GOP “a lasting electoral advantage”, backing plaintiffs who alleged the maps were drawn to undermine Democratic candidates.

Democratic Governor Tom Wolf subsequently refused a new map drawn by Republicans, who in turn repudiated a proposed map from Mr Wolf as a “ridiculously hypocritical and a partisan move to help Nancy Pelosi, the DNC and Pennsylvania Democrats steal Pennsylvania congressional seats”. The disagreement put the matter in the hands of the court.

By rejecting Republican-drawn districts and issuing new maps intended to be more balanced, the court sent a charge through the politic landscape of a perennial swing state months out from November elections.

Democrats hope they will be able to wrest the House of Representatives from Republican control – Republicans currently hold 13 out of Pennsylvania’s 18 House seats – and some analysts said the new maps would benefit Democrats.

“The early indications are that this is a much more competitive map which will help the Democrats compared to the gerrymandered maps drawn by the Republican legislature,” election law analyst Rick Hasen wrote.

The new map was “actively helping Dems compensate for their natural geographic disadvantage,” analyst Dave Wasserman of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report said on Twitter.

“Make no mistake: this is the PA map Dems wanted,” he wrote.

Republicans have said they plan to challenge the new map in court. The prospect of continued legal wrangling injects uncertainty into the plan to have new districts in place in time for May primary elections.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in