Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

NSA watchdog to launch probe amid Tucker Carlson’s claims that agency spied on him

Intel agency previously stated Fox host ‘has never been an intelligence target’

Alex Woodward
New York
Tuesday 10 August 2021 11:11 EDT
Comments
NSA denies Tucker Carlson's claim it is spying on him in bid to get his show taken off air

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The internal watchdog at the National Security Agency announced that the office will perform a review “related to recent allegations” that the intelligence agency “improperly targeted the communications of a member of the US news media”.

Though the announcement on 10 August does not mention Fox News host Tucker Carlson, the announcement follows his allegations that the agency had spied on his communications, a claim that the agency has denied.

“Tucker Carlson has never been an intelligence target of the Agency and the NSA has never had any plans to try to take his program off the air,” the agency said in a statement on 29 June.

The NSA’s Office of the Inspector General “is examining NSA’s compliance with applicable legal authorities and agency policies and procedures regarding collection, analysis, reporting, and dissemination activities, including unmasking procedures, and whether any such actions were based upon improper considerations”, according to an announcement on Tuesday. “If circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider other issues that may arise during the review.”

Mr Carlson broadcast his programme from Hungary last week following the government’s years-long attempt to court Fox News; Mr Carlson had also reportedly sought an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin through US-based Kremlin intermediaries, according to Axios.

While the agency is ostensibly tasked with foreign signals, its broad, warrantless surveillance dragnet and collaboration with federal law enforcement has faced widespread criticism and allegations of civil rights abuses. But legal experts have suggested that if Mr Carlson was swept up in any government monitoring, he may have contacted foreign agents under surveillance, though those messages would have masked his identity.

“It is unclear why Carlson, or his source, would think this outreach could be the basis for NSA surveillance or a motive to have his show canceled,” Axios reported.

His NSA allegations sparked right-wing backlash, including among some members of Congress, and he submitted Freedom of Information Act requests to obtain NSA data as far back as 2019, when Hungary hired Washington DC-based lobbyists to arrange an interview on his programme.

He insisted that NSA “leaked the contents of my e-mail to journalists in an effort to discredit me” and lashed out at journalists who submitted FOIA requests of their own to determine what exactly Mr Carlson sought from the NSA.

In a statement to The Independent, a spokesperson for Fox News said: “We are gratified to learn the NSA’s egregious surveillance of Tucker Carlson will now be independently investigated. As we have said, for the NSA to unmask Tucker Carlson or any journalist attempting to secure a newsworthy interview is entirely unacceptable and raises serious questions about their activities as well as their original denial, which was wildly misleading.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in