Nafta: Trump administration begins trade deal renegotiations by claiming it has 'failed many Americans'
'We feel that Nafta...needs major improvement'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump’s trade representative began talks on renegotiating the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement by bashing the deal, saying the pact between the US, Canada and Mexico has “fundamentally failed” many Americans.
“I want to be clear that [Mr Trump] is not interested in a mere tweaking of a few provisions and a couple of updated chapters,” said US trade representative Robert Lighthizer, who is leading the American team aiming to overhaul the 23-year-old trade deal. “We feel that Nafta...needs major improvement.”
The talks that started this week in Washington are the first of several rounds to renegotiate the agreement Mr Trump has repeatedly declared as “the worst trade deal” because it is “very, very bad for our companies and for our workers”.
“The views of the President about Nafta, which I completely share, are well known,” Mr Lighthizer said.
While noting that many Americans have benefited from Nafta, particularly farmers and ranchers, Mr Lighthizer said “the huge trade deficits, the lost manufacturing jobs, the businesses that have closed or moved because of incentives” in the current agreement cannot be ignored.
While the US did lose about 5.6m manufacturing jobs between 2000 and 2010, 85 per cent of these jobs losses are attributable to technological change – largely automation – rather than international trade, according to a study by the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University.
A major focus of the Nafta renegotiation talks is likely to be on trade deficits, which Mr Trump appears to view as an indicator of economic health.
“In 1993, when NAFTA was approved, the United States and Mexico experienced relatively balanced trade,” Mr Lighthizer said in his opening statement. “However since then, we have had persistent trade deficits – in the last year totaling nearly $57bn.”
While pointing out that the US has seen improvement in its trade balance with Canada in recent years, he said America’s deficit in goods has exceeded $365bn.
“Canada doesn’t view trade surpluses or deficits as a primary measure of whether a trading relationship works,” Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland said, noting that the US has a surplus in trade of goods and services with Canada.
Ms Freeland also lauded the “deep friendship our countries share.”
Economic experts have asserted that using trade deficits or surpluses to measure US commercial relations with any single country, as Mr Trump does, ignores the complexities of trade in today's global economy. What matters is the totality of trade, the experts argue.
Mexico’s Economy Secretary Ildefonso Guajardo said his country “thinks that Nafta has been a strong success for all parties”, adding that achieving a consensus on a renegotiated agreement won’t be easy.
“Let’s not be mistaken, the first challenge we have is to find a common ground among the three countries,” he said. “For a deal to be successful, it has to work for all parties involved; otherwise it is not a deal.”
Mr Trump will need the approval of Congress for any revised agreement to go into effect. While Democrats have sought changes to Nafta for a long time, the President’s political problems could complicate the possibility of any alliance.
There also appears to be little if any congressional support for Mr Trump’s threat to withdraw from the trade deal if Mexico and Canada protest to changes.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments