Missouri bid to enforce Bible classes in public schools advances
But critics question why the bill is necessary at all: 'I do not need the state teaching my son the Bible'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Republican politician in Missouri wants to add Bible classes to public school curriculums, and a bill to do just that is moving forward in the state’s legislature.
The measure was introduced by state Representative Ben Baker, and would require state officials to come up with curriculum guidelines for elective courses on the Old Testament and New Testament.
“The Bible is simply a part of the fabric of life,” Mr Baker told his colleagues on Tuesday, according to the St Louis Post-Dispatch.
Mr Baker is also an employee at Ozark Bible College in Neosho, Missouri. The classes he has proposed are among three similar proposals that are being considered in the statehouse.
On Tuesday, he said he expected the measure to be controversial, with critics likely to claim the classes would violate the constitutional protections between church and state.
“This is something, for whatever reason over the course of time, has caused a lot of controversy,” he said. “Obviously, there is going to be controversy.”
Some of that criticism came from Brian Kaylor, a pastor at the Second Baptist Church in Jefferson City, who testified before the committee considering the bill.
“I oppose this legislation not because I oppose the Bible,” Mr Kaylor said. “The Bible cannot be reduced to merely an elective high school class. The Bible is inherently religious and we cannot pretend otherwise.”
He continued: “I do not need the state teaching my son the Bible.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments