Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Mississippi governor defends law forcing incest survivors to carry babies to term: ‘It’s less than 1%’

‘When you look at the number of [abortions] that actually involve incest, it’s less than 1 per cent’

Maroosha Muzaffar
Monday 09 May 2022 05:16 EDT
Comments
Mississippi governor defends law forcing victims of incest to carry baby to term

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Mississippi governor Tate Reeves has defended a state law that forces women and girls impregnated through incest to carry their babies to term.

“Why is it acceptable in your state to force girls who are victims of incest to carry those children to term?” Mr Reeves was asked in an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper on Sunday.

The governor answered by saying Mississippi had “a trigger law in place” that was passed in 2007, something that would come into effect if the Roe v Wade ruling gets overturned by the US Supreme Court.

When Tapper asked the governor to “explain why” there are no exceptions in Mississippi’s “trigger law” for incest survivors, the Republican governor replied: “Well, that’s gonna be the law because in 2007 the Mississippi legislature passed it.”

The governer further defended the law by saying that “when you look at the number of [abortions] that actually involve incest, it’s less than 1 per cent”.

Tapper further questioned Mr Tate on abortion care and general healthcare in the state.

“Let me ask you, what about a foetus that has serious or fatal abnormalities that will not allow that foetus to live outside the womb? Is the state of Mississippi going to force those girls and women who have this tragedy inside them to carry the child to term? Are you going to force them to do that?”

Mr Reeves tried to evade the question by saying it was only a “very small” per cent of abortions that would be affected by the lack of exceptions.

“Mississippi, as you know, has the highest rate of infant mortality in the United States,” Tapper said.

“You have the highest rate of child poverty in the United States. Your state has no guaranteed maternity leave that’s paid. The legislature in Mississippi just rejected extending postpartum Medicaid coverage. Your foster care system is also the subject of a long-running federal lawsuit over its failure to protect children from abuse.”

“You say you want to do more to support mothers and children. But you have been in state government since 2004. You were the state treasurer. Then you were the lieutenant governor. Now you’re the governor, Based on the track record of the state of Mississippi, why should any of these girls or moms believe you?” Tapper asked.

The governor admitted his state has “a long history of poor health outcomes” and promised he is “focusing every day on fixing the challenges that are before us”.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand from New York later termed the governor’s responses as “quite paternalistic towards women”.

“He indicated… that all we need is more education for women. I was pretty offended by his remarks. He doesn’t look at women as full citizens. He’s taken away their right to make these fundamental decisions about when they’re having children, under what circumstances they’re having children, how many children they’re having, and at what point in their life they’re having children,” she said.

“It’s outrageous that this governor and governors and legislatures across America are going to take this draft opinion, when it is final, and deny women these fundamental life-and-death decisions about their future and about their families,” she added.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in