Michael Flynn case takes another unexpected turn as full appeals court agrees to reconsider ruling
Attorney General William Barr has denied dropping charges against Mr Flynn at the request of President Trump
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A federal appeals court will review a judge's attempt to examine the Justice Department's decision to drop its criminal case against Donald Trump's first national security adviser, Michael Flynn.
The long-unusual saga got even more unusual on Thursday when the full US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit agreed to examine US District Judge Emmet Sullivan's appointment of a retired federal judge to look at how DOJ handled its case.
Oral arguments are slated for 11 August.
Mr Sullivan and Flynn's legal counsel have for months been involved in a complicated legal back-and-forth.
Mr Trump had called for his former aide and friends to be cleared of all charges of lying about his contacts with Russians during the 2016 presidential campaign and Mr Trump's transition period in 2016 and early 2017.
Attorney General William Barr ordered a review of the case in January before dropping the charges, saying the criminal case lacked "any legitimate investigative basis."
Legal experts said that meant the AG determined even if Mr Flynn lied, those false statements did not amount to a crime.
Mr Barr was accused during a contentious Tuesday hearing by Democratic House Judiciary Committee members of using his office to help Mr Trump's friends. He spent hours denying those allegations.
The president has not resisted weighing in on his friend's case, long contending federal officials under former President Barack Obama came after Mr Flynn to punish him.
He has said Mr Flynn was treated "unfairly," and never ruled out a pardon. In late April, he called the retired Army three-star general a "fine man."
"I'm very happy about General Flynn. He was treated horribly," Mr Trump told reporters on 24 June after DOJ dropped the case. "He was treated very, very horribly by a group of very bad people, and I think you'll see things are going to start to come out. "But what happened to General Flynn should never happen again in our country. He was persecuted, and many other people were persecuted."
Obama administration officials say they did not spy on the 2016 Trump campaign, and did not wrongfully investigate Mr Flynn.
He's been exonerated, and I want to congratulate him. He's been through a lot.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments