Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Madison Cawthorn mocked for wishing US would spend $40bn on veterans when VA budget is $301bn

‘It would mean we cut the VA budget by about 300 billion’

Maroosha Muzaffar
Thursday 12 May 2022 05:24 EDT
Comments
File: Social media users hit out at Madison Cawthorn for voting ‘against veterans at every chance’
File: Social media users hit out at Madison Cawthorn for voting ‘against veterans at every chance’ (AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Representative Madison Cawthorn from North Carolina was mocked on social media after he wrote that he wished the US would spend $40bn on veterans instead of on Ukraine.

“Imagine if we spent $40 Billion on veterans,” the representative tweeted.

Political commentators later mocked Mr Cawthorn by pointing out that the country’s Veteran Affairs (VA) department had requested a total $301bn budget.

The department’s website states that the budget request for the 2023 fiscal was a 13.3 per cent increase compared to the enacted levels from the 2022 fiscal.

Mr Cawthorn received several scathing responses to his tweet.

Ron Filipkowski, former federal prosecutor and current defence attorney, wrote: “In addition to pensions and other benefits, the VA budget alone last year was $270 Billion, and have requested an increase of $31 billion this year for a total of $301 Billion. Since he is on the Veteran’s Committee, I assume he knows that.”

Others accused the North Carolina representative of a discrepancy between his tweet and his actions.

“A couple of weeks ago you voted against a bill expanding health care for veterans exposed to burn pits and other toxins,” wrote one user.

Another pointed out: “Imagine voting against 12 bills that would benefit veterans and then posting this tweet.”

“You use them to score political points but then once they’re actually in front of you they’re on their f****** own,” the user commented.

Don Moynihan, a professor at Georgetown University, said implementing Mr Cawthorn’s wish would mean cutting the VA budget “by about 300 billion”.

Meanwhile, The Daily Beast reported that conservatives in North Carolina, along with outgoing senator Thom Tillis, are openly saying they want Mr Cawthorn gone.

The report also mentioned the Republicans “tolerated” the North Carolina representative until very recently when he said in a podcast that conservatives in Washington DC engage in “drug-fueled orgies”.

Mr Cawthorn has since then been at the receiving end of embarrassing disclosures.

“The reality is Cawthorn has spent the last year making enemies, from Capitol Hill to the corner of North Carolina that he represents,” the report said.

“The congressman’s most recent string of unforced errors – from the coke-and-orgy comments to disparaging Ukraine’s president as a ‘thug’ – merely helped to consolidate a powerful coalition of longtime foes and former friends,” it added.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in