Defense Secretary strips Guantánamo official of power to reach settlements, after 9/11 plotter controversy
Defense Department and war prosecutors locked in back-and-forth over plea deals for three 9/11 plotters
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin revoked the authority of the official running the war court at Guantánamo Bay to reach settlements, the latest legal twist tied to a long-running drama over the fate of the alleged 9/11 plotters who are detained there.
In a memo dated Monday, obtained by The New York Times, Austin removed Susan K. Escallier’s ability to reach settlements in two separate cases, the U.S.S. Cole and Bali bombings, “effective immediately.”
The move was meant to ensure “we aren’t surprised by anything for the remainder of the term,” a senior Defense Department official told the paper.
The controversy dates back to July 31, when military prosecutors reached an agreement with alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and two alleged accomplices ahead of their capital trial. The men would plead guilty in exchange for receiving a life sentence.
Two days later, Austin sought to revoke the agreements.
By November, a military judge ruled that the Defense Secretary had acted too late and the deals were valid. Military prosecutors have suggested they will appeal the decision.
Two-thirds of the 30 remaining detainees in the controversial prison have not been convicted or charged with a crime, while 16 among this group have been approved for transfer to other countries pending security arrangements.
The 9/11 case has been in pre-trial status since 2012, as attorneys wrestle with issues tied to CIA’s torture of the alleged plotters.
As The Independent has reported, decades after the beginning of the War on Terror, the CIA still has not disclosed the full extent of its influence and activities at Guantánamo, prompting a lawsuit from Ammar al-Baluchi, a separate 9/11 detainee not include in the original plea deal.
His lawyers argue the CIA wrongly dodged a records requests about Guantánamo’s mysterious Camp 7, where detainees who had been held in secret CIA “black site” prisons and torture sites around the world were deposited ahead of further interrogations.
The Trump administration hasn’t publicly signalled its stance on the 9/11 plotter plea deals.