Victory to LGBT+ activists as Supreme court declines hearing on transgender bathroom case
Decision means lower court ruling will stand
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Supreme Court decided against hearing arguments in a case over the constitutionality of restroom policies that prevent transgender students from using the bathroom of their choice in public schools, handing a victory to LGBT+ activists.
The decision to not hear arguments in Gloucester County School Board v Grimm means that a lower court ruling that found such policies to be unconstitutional as well as in violation of federal Title IX protections will stand.
Mr Grimm, now 22 years old, originally sued his school district’s board after his school principal issued a policy restricting students to the bathrooms corresponding with their gender at birth, forcing Mr Grimm, who identifies as male, into the women’s restroom.
The case proceeded through the courts for years and in 2020 resulted in a victory for Mr Grimm and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which represented his case, at the federal appellate level when a panel of judges ruled in his favor.
On Monday, Mr Grimm and the ACLU both celebrated the court’s decision, which they described as an end to his legal fight but not of efforts to discriminate against transgender Americans, particularly students.
“I am glad that my years-long fight to have my school see me for who I am is over. Being forced to use the nurse’s room, a private bathroom, and the girl’s room was humiliating for me, and having to go to out-of-the-way bathrooms severely interfered with my education,” said Mr Grimm on Monday.
“Trans youth deserve to use the bathroom in peace without being humiliated and stigmatized by their own school boards and elected officials,” he added.
ACLU senior staff attorney Josh Block added that the decision was “an incredible victory for Gavin and for transgender students around the country”.
“Our work is not yet done, and the ACLU is continuing to fight against anti-trans laws targeting trans youth in states around the country,” added Mr Block.
The Supreme Court’s decision to deny certiorari in the case comes as states across the country have unleashed a wave of legislation targeting transgender adults and children in the months following the 2020 election.
The Human Rights Watch warned in May that conservative-led states were on a record-setting pace for passing anti-LGBT+ legislation. Arkansas has gone the furthest, and earlier this year became the first state to ban gender-affirming therapy for transgender youth.
“The rights of LGBTQ people – and especially transgender people – across the country are being systematically threatened and undermined by national anti-LGBTQ groups coordinating with anti-equality lawmakers to wage an unprecedented war on the LGBTQ community,” the group warned at the time.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments