Lawyer explains why Michael Flynn's immunity request changes everything
'Flynn's immunity request very strongly suggests there was a criminal conspiracy at the highest levels of government'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Michael Flynn’s unusual immunity request suggests the Trump administration has been involved in a "criminal conspiracy", according to a US legal commentator.
The former national security adviser, who was forced to step down for failing to disclose the extent of his meetings with Russian diplomats, has agreed to co-operate with investigations into links between Russia and the Trump administration.
Mr Flynn will testify for the Senate and House Intelligence Committees’ investigation into Russia links and alleged interference in the 2016 election - but only if he is granted immunity from prosecution.
“General Flynn certainly has a story to tell, and he very much wants to tell it”, said his lawyer in a statement released Thursday.
Seth Abramson, a former attorney turned academic and journalist, said that a number of aspects of Mr Flynn’s request were “bizarre”.
Immunity is generally granted in secret deals between attorneys and investigators, so it it is unusual Mr Flynn’s lawyers have made their request so publicly.
“If he really had some very specific information about Trump campaign collusion with the Russians ... there’s no way a lawyer would try to sell that information for immunity by way of release of a statement,” law professor Ronald Wright told Vox.
Mr Abramson went on to speculate that the very public nature of the statement could mean that Flynn had agreed to give evidence which would incriminate Mr Trump or a large number of his associates - “delivering a bigger fish” or a “huge number of smaller ones.”
“Another possibility is that Flynn might fear for his life”, said the attorney. “Flynn so publicly implying he has the goods on Russiagate greatly increases the risk of discovery for anyone trying to silence him.”
“Let's be clear: Flynn's immunity request very strongly suggests there was a criminal conspiracy at the highest levels of government.”
He also speculated the former security adviser might be scrambling to be first in an “immunity race”, as a number of other high-profile Republicans and Trump associates might also be implicated in the Russia investigation.
However, NBC reported on Friday that the Senate Intelligence Committee had rejected the immunity request. A senior Congressional officially said immunity was “wildly preliminary” and “not on the table” at this point.
It does not necessarily rule out immunity being granted at a later date.
Mr Flynn was criticised after an interview emerged in which he said: “When you are given immunity, that means that you have probably committed a crime,”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments