‘Enough really is enough’: Arizona county seeks sanctions for Kari Lake’s lawyers over election denial
Ms Lake continues to claim her loss to Ms Hobbs was the result of a rigged election despite having no evidence to support such arguments
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Attorneys for Arizona’s largest county and the state’s next governor have asked a court to levy sanctions against the lawyers who filed a frivolous election fraud lawsuit on behalf of failed gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake.
In a memorandum filed in Arizona Superior Court, the Maricopa County Attorney’s office and Ms Hobbs’ legal team asked a judge to issue an order for sanctions — financial and otherwise — against Ms Lake and the attorneys who filed a lawsuit in state court seeking to overturn Ms Lake’s loss to Ms Hobbs.
“Enough really is enough. It is past time to end unfounded attacks on elections and unwarranted accusations against elections officials. This matter was brought without any legitimate justification, let alone a substantial one,” said the Maricopa County attorneys, whose request was joined by Ms Hobbs’ team in a separate filing.
The lawyers also noted that Ms Lake had made public statements pledging to only accept the results of the 2020 election if she won, and said the “entire purpose” of Ms Lake’s failed lawsuit was “to plant baseless seeds of doubt in the electorate’s mind about the integrity and security of the 2022 General Election in Maricopa County”.
“While it is one thing to do so on TV or social media sites, it is another thing entirely to attempt to use the imprimatur of the courts to try to achieve that goal,” they said, adding that Ms Lake’s “obvious attempt to do so” was worthy of sanctions under Arizona state law.
They further argued that Ms Lake’s claims, which a judge dismissed outright last week, were “made in bad faith” that was “demonstrated by her scattershot approach to litigation, her claims’ lack of legal and factual merit,” and the lawsuit’s role in “a larger scheme” by Ms Lake meant to “ to spread disinformation about elections and election results in Maricopa County,” and pointed out that she “has not stopped,” citing a Christmas Day tweet by the former local TV news anchor sharing an article which accused the Arizona judge who dismissed her lawsuit of having been told how to rule by Democratic election attorney Marc Elias.
“Plaintiff had decided well before the election that if the results did not favor her, she would deny that they were legitimate. And she misused this Court to do so,” they said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments