Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Kamala Harris gets potentially huge boost due to change in Democrats' presidential primary schedule

Shift will force candidates to spend time and money on populous California 

Jeremy B. White
San Francisco
Thursday 28 September 2017 00:30 BST
Comments
Senator Kamala Harris - seen here in Washington, DC on June 21, 2017 - could be one of the beneficiaries of California changing its elections calendar
Senator Kamala Harris - seen here in Washington, DC on June 21, 2017 - could be one of the beneficiaries of California changing its elections calendar (REUTERS/Joshua Roberts)

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

California has moved up its presidential primary by months, a change that could reconfigure the 2020 election and boost Senator Kamala Harris if she runs for president.

Despite being America’s most populous state, California has wielded minimal influence over which presidential candidates win their parties’ nominations. Because California has not held its primaries until June, contenders typically have sewn up the votes they need before the Golden State votes.

But a bill shifting California’s nominating contest to March, signed into law by Gov Jerry Brown on Wednesday, will reverberate through the nominating process.

Presidential contenders will now need to invest time and money into vying for California’s hundreds of delegates. Running campaigns in California is a costly proposition because the vast state encompasses several major media markets, which requires multiple ad buys.

That would be a sharp departure from a status quo in which candidates tend to visit California to raise money but do little to campaign there, spurring complaints that millions of voters are being effectively sidelined in the nominating process. Proponents of moving up California’s primary have argued that the diverse state is more representative of the national electorate than overwhelmingly white early voting states like Iowa and New Hampshire.

“The Prime Time Primary puts California voters in the front seat in choosing our next president and will change our elections for the better”, state Sen Ricardo Lara, the bill’s author, said in a statement. “We have a responsibility to drive a different agenda at the national level and promote inclusion and consensus not the politics of division”.

The move could also buoy Ms Harris, a first-term Democrat whose potential presidential aspirations have fueled rumors since shortly after she took office. Having served two terms as the state’s attorney general, Ms Harris would have the advantage of name recognition and an existing donor network.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in