‘Categorically untrue’: Jan 6 hearing finds Trump lied about Mike Pence agreeing he could overturn election
Pence’s chief legal counsel rebukes ex-president
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An attorney who served as Mike Pence’s chief legal counsel in the days leading up to January 6 rebuked Donald Trump and said that a statement the president put out claiming that the vice president agreed he had the power to overturn the election was “categorically false”.
Greg Jacob made the declaration on Thursday just before the House January 6 committee.
Asked about a statement Mr Trump put out on the day before the riot claiming that he and Pence were in “total agreement” about the vice president’s authority to interfere in the electoral vote count, Mr Jacob said that the vice president’s team was “shocked and disappointed”.
“[W]e were shocked and disappointed, because whoever had written and put that statement out, it was categorically untrue,” said Mr Jacob.
The episode underscores how Mr Trump pursued the seemingly hopeless effort to convince his vice president to interfere in the election and attempt to overturn the results up until the very hours of the Senate’s meeting to certify his loss, despite all indications that Mr Pence had no intention of doing so.
The statement he released claiming that he and Mr Pence were in “total agreement” came on the evening of 5 January, less than 24 hours before rioters would attack the US Capitol in his name.
Several witnesses close to Mr Pence testified or had their testimony played by the committee on Thursday, including Marc Short, Mr Pence’s ex-chief of staff and a current aide to the Republican politician as he continues to maintain his political brand and pursue further ambitions.
Mr Short testified that Mr Pence had personally made clear to Mr Trump in the days leading up to January 6 that he did not believe he had the authority to interfere in the process, which would directly contradict Mr Trump’s 5 January claim. The contradiction is just another drop in the bucket of outright falsehoods and conspiracy theories that Mr Trump has personally spread or latched on to in relation to the 2020 election.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments