Iowa Supreme Court rules abortion not protected by state constitution, reversing decision from just four years ago
State’s highest court rules abortion access is no longer a constitutionally protected right as states prepare for imminent Supreme Court decision that could end federal protections for care
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Iowa’s Supreme Court has overruled a 2018 decision protecting abortion access under the state’s constitution, opening the door for more abortion restrictions in the state as the US Supreme Court prepares for its likely decision to overturn federal protections for abortion care.
A decision from the state’s highest court on 17 June reverses a lower court ruling to block a 24-hour waiting period before an abortion can be performed, arguing that the ruling from just four years ago that affirmed a constitutional right to abortion care “insufficiently recognizes that future human lives are at stake”.
The ruling from the court – now composed almost entirely of Republican appointees – means anti-abortion legislators no longer must contend with the state’s constitutional protections for abortion care, which could have remained in place even if the Supreme Court does undermine Roe.
Friday’s decision sends a case challenging the waiting period law back to a lower court.
Iowa’s justices argued that the court is not obligated to follow precedent after a 2018 ruling affirmed that “autonomy and dominion over one’s body go to the very heart of what it means to be free”.
The court’s only remaining Democratic appointee, Justice Brent Appel, wrote in his dissent that “the right to reproductive autonomy should not be eviscerated by narrow textualism”.
The state’s Republican Governor Kim Reynolds said Friday’s decision marks a “significant victory in our fight to protect the unborn”.
The court’s reversal reflects the nation’s reshaped conservative judiciary as Republican officials pursue legal challenges to defend their anti-abortion laws under Roe v Wade, while GOP legislators file a wave of restrictive legislation to dramatically reduce abortion access and criminalise providers.
The US Supreme Court is expected to issue its ruling in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Orgnization, a case involving a Mississippi law that bans abortion at 15 weeks of pregnancy. A leaked draft opinion in that case signals that the court will overturn the 1973 decision in Roe v Wade and its affirming decision in1992’s Planned Parenthood v Casey.
Without 50-year-old Roe protections, roughly half of US states could immediately or quickly outlaw abortion, including 13 states with so-called “trigger” bans in place – laws designed to take effect without Roe.
Iowa already has a ban on abortions at six weeks of pregnancy, before many patients know they are pregnant, but the law was ruled unconstitutional.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments