Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Josh Hawley goes after Biden Supreme Court pick for record on sex offenders

Comments suggest tough path ahead for bipartisan confirmation of first Black woman to the Court

John Bowden
Monday 21 March 2022 08:58 EDT
Comments
Watch live as Biden speaks about nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A right-wing senator whose support of the protesters who subsequently attacked the Capitol last year – and who became the stuff of headlines and furious editorials – is now speaking out against the judicial record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, Joe Biden’s nominee to the Supreme Court.

Josh Hawley delivered his criticism of Ms Jackson in a lengthy Twitter thread published on 16 March, in which he questioned a series of statements she had made in various points of her career, including her time in law school as well as at the US Sentencing Commission.

Mr Hawley focused his fire on the judge’s writings about child pornography and paedophilia, and highlighted discussions in which Ms Jackson had taken part where she questioned sentencing guidelines for those accused of possessing such images or videos. The senator from Missouri in particular pointed to one decision Ms Jackson had made from the bench in which she gave a convicted possessor of child pornography a drastically lower sentence than what had been suggested under sentencing guidelines.

“Judge Jackson has a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes, both as a judge and as a policymaker. She’s been advocating for it since law school. This goes beyond ‘soft on crime’. I’m concerned that this a record that endangers our children,” he wrote.

In the numerous examples Mr Hawley cited, the images of Ms Jackson’s quotations did not include any context regarding her remarks. Nor was context given for the several cases the senator referenced in which Ms Jackson purportedly gave sex offenders lower sentences than were suggested. Information about the cases he mentioned could not immediately be located.

His comments have yet to be echoed publicly by many Republican senators, but there are murmurs of Republicans formulating a campaign of opposition to her nomination on the grounds of supposedly being “soft on crime”.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told his fellow senators on the chamber floor that “the soft on crime brigade is squarely in Judge Jackson’s corner” earlier this week, and the Republican National Committee has reportedly attacked her past work as a public defender representing detainees at the notorious Guantanamo Bay detention facility in a background paper to Republican senators.

Because of rules in the Senate changed by Mr McConnell early on during the Trump administration, Democrats can confirm Ms Jackson to the bench without a single GOP vote should their entire Senate caucus be unified on her nomination. Still, the White House has expressed confidence that Ms Jackson’s nomination will appeal to Republicans as well.

A handful of key swing vote Republican senators including Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski and Maine’s Susan Collins have yet to indicate how their votes on Ms Jackson’s nomination will go, but that’s expected to change very soon as her Senate confirmation hearings are set to begin next week.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in