Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

George Santos loses temper in CNN meltdown as he’s questioned about alleged crimes: ‘I stand convicted’

Santos clashes with CNN’s Erin Burnett when questioned about exaggerations in his biography

Alisha Rahaman Sarkar
Wednesday 13 September 2023 02:18 EDT
Comments
George Santos clashes with interviewer as he is questioned about alleged crimes

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Embattled representative George Santos on Tuesday had a meltdown on live television when confronted about his alleged plethora of fabrications during a CNN interview.

The freshman member of Congress was questioned by anchor Erin Burnett about the alleged lies Mr Santos said ranging from his education to employment, that have landed him 13 criminal counts, along with a House Ethics Panel investigation.

The visibly flustered Long Island representative responded by trying to deflect the conversation toward president Joe Biden. "Erin, you know what would be great? I’m not deflecting, but I’m just going to call you out here and CNN," Mr Santos said.

"Have you brought Joe Biden on the network and spoken about all the things he’s said across the last 46 years,” he questioned.

When Burnett pointed out that Mr Santos had been informed prior to the interview about the range of questions about his past statements, the congressman brought up Democratic senators Elizabeth Warren and Richard Blumenthal.

“No, I am not answering these questions to you, I have done them extensively in other interviews and people can see it elsewhere,” he continued.

Mr Santos also denied striking a plea with the Justice Department after pleading not guilty in May to the 13 federal charges, which include embezzling money from his campaign, falsely receiving unemployment funds and lying to Congress about his finances.

He told Burnett he couldn’t go into detail because it would “cheapen" his "ability to defend” himself. In a recent filing, the prosecutors said that Mr Santos engaged in discussions about "possible paths forward in this matter".

“Why don’t you ask the DOJ what they meant by the letter, the letter was submitted by them not my counsel," he added.

He then went on to rebut a widely reported claim that he settled a case against him in Brazil, where he was allegedly charged with defrauding a clerk of $1,300 by using a fake name and a stolen checkbook in 2008.

"I don’t know where you’re getting your information from. But I would challenge you to bring up receipts on that because that’s not how it happened in Brazil," the congressman said.

Mr Santos allegedly agreed to pay the victim $2,800 and a fine to the Brazilian government in exchange for the charge to be dropped, CNN reported.

"I’m not engaging on this because, again, if you can’t prove to the American people your allegations, then I’m not going to entertain it. You, please, you guys need to be better prepared next time," he claimed.

When asked about allegations of swindling $3,000 in donations for a disabled veteran’s dying service dog, he claimed that there were “hundreds of people” who would “vouch for his work in animal advocacy”.

“The reality is whatever happened to him, whatever communication happened there, it's unfortunate.

“But I stand convicted. I did not hurt him or did not hurt his dog.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in