Florida supreme court allows six-week abortion ban but says voters will decide issue in November
The Sunshine State’s highest court upheld strict abortion laws supported by Ron DeSantis – while also allowing a ballot measure that would reverse them
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Abortion rights will be on the ballot in Florida this November, the state’s Supreme Court said in a highly anticipated ruling on Monday.
Just hours before the 1 April deadline, the panel of seven justices – all appointed by Governor Ron DeSantis – said that a proposed constitutional amendment to protect abortion should be put to voters this November.
At the same time, however, the judges overturned more than three decades of precedent to uphold the ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, which was signed into law by governor Ron DeSantis in 2022.
That will mean a more restrictive law signed last year, which bans nearly all abortions after six weeks, will now go into effect – until and unless voters choose to overturn it.
In addition to the abortion vote, Florida voters will also cast their ballot against or for removing criminal and civil penalties for those 21 years or older who use marijuana.
“I applaud the Florida Supreme Court’s decision today to allow a ballot initiative protecting abortion rights in the Sunshine State,” said Florida congressman Jared Moskowitz, a Democrat, on Monday.
“Everyone deserves the right to make their own healthcare decisions, and this referendum gives women the opportunity to voice that opinion.”
His colleague Maxwell Frost, who represents most of Orlando, likewise said: “There’s so much at stake, we can’t stay home on 5 November.”
Anna Eskamani, a Democrat serving in the Florida state legislator, said the new six-week abortion ban would be “devastating”, but said she was “confident that the tide will turn” this November.
Conversely, Florida’s Republican attorney general Ashley Moody praised the court’s ruling on abortion rights while criticising it for allowing a “vague and misleading” constitutional amendment on the ballot.
“We have argued from the beginning that these new constitutional initiatives will mislead voters. We maintain that it will be an uphill battle to educate them. However, we respect the court’s decisions,” Ms Moody said.
The proposed Amendment 4 would protect Floridians’ right to an abortion up until the point of “viability” – or the point at which a fetus could survive outside of the womb, largely considered to be around 24 weeks.
The amendment received around 1.5 million signatures from Florida voters, which was more than enough to put both on the 2024 ballot, and must now win at least 60 per cent of the vote in order to become law.
Ms Moody had challenged the amendment by claiming that the language of “viability” was vague and deceptive.
The law, she argued, was designed to “lay ticking time bombs that will enable abortion proponents later to argue that the amendment has a much broader meaning than voters would ever have thought”.
Chief justice Carlos G Muñiz appeared sceptical of that argument, saying in February: “The people of Florida aren’t stupid – they can figure things out. People can see for themselves whether it’s too broad or vague.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments