FBI calls threats to law enforcement ‘reprehensible’ and urges public to report suspicious activity
Agency makes public statement after issuing joint memo with DHS warning of threats
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The FBI is warning of “reprehensible” rhetoric and threats targeting FBI agents and personnel and urging the public’s assistance in stopping domestic extremism after the bureau’s office in Ohio was attacked and it continues to face the wrath of Donald Trump’s supporters.
A statement from the agency was provided by a spokesperson to The Independent on Monday, days after it joined with the Department of Homeland Security in a joint internal memo warning that threats of violence against FBI and law enforcement personnel were on the rise after the execution of a search warrant last week at Mr Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate and resort.
The agency is investigating the alleged illegal retention of classified documents with potential national security implications at the Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, a relatively unsecure location compared to the White House.
"The FBI is always concerned about violence and threats of violence to law enforcement, including the men and women of the FBI. We work closely with our law enforcement partners to assess and respond to such threats, which are reprehensible and dangerous,” said the spokesperson for the bureau.
“As always, we would like to remind members of the public that if they observe anything suspicious to report it to law enforcement immediately,” they continued.
The statement comes after an armed protest outside of the bureau’s headquarters in Phoenix, Arizona, as well as a shooting and standoff that began at the agency’s headquarters building in Cincinatti, Ohio.
In the agency’s memo over the weekend, it directly linked the sharp rise in violent threats to Mr Trump’s efforts to stoke his supporters’ anger, though not mentioning the former president by name.
Officials wrote that “the FBI and DHS have observed an increase in violent threats posted on social media against federal officials and facilities,” and said that the surge can be attributed to the execution of “a court-authorized search warrant in Palm Beach, Florida”.
Many legal analysts have speculated that Mr Trump or his staff could face serious criminal liability if classified documents were present at Mar-a-Lago after the president left the White House, especially given that his team previously told the Justice Department that those documents had been returned. The New York Times also reported that some of the documents may involve nuclear materials, raising the stakes even higher.
The Justice Department also continues to run a separate grand jury investigation surrounding the events of January 6; it isn’t clear yet whether the raid at Mar-a-Lago was at all related to that probe given that the contents of the documents is unknown by the public.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments