Donald Trump's tweets about Obama 'wiretapping his phone' could set a dangerous precedent
Mr Trump has previously taken a strong stance against leaks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.By tweeting what, if true, would have been classified information, President Donald Trump may have set a dangerous precedent with his claim Barack Obama ordered his office wiretapped before the election.
Mr Trump alleged in a string of angry messages on Saturday that his predecessor had ordered his New York office be put under surveillance "just before the victory". He called Mr Obama a "bad (or sick) guy" and likened the supposed move to "Nixon/Watergate".
The unsubstantiated claim appeared to have originated in a conservative radio broadcast, later written up on Breitbart, the far-right, Trump-backing website headed until recently by Steve Bannon, now the President's chief strategist.
Mr Trump's early-morning tweets would have been criminal had they been posted by anyone else—and had the claim, denied by Mr Obama, been true—according to a former FBI lawyer.
Matt Olsen, also the ex-director of the National Counterterrorism Centre, told ABC News: "Anyone who would reveal the existence of a wiretap would violate federal law.
"It is against federal law to disclose the existence of a wiretap, whether that wiretap is for criminal purposes or intelligence purposes."
The President is the US' top classification authority.
But if Mr Trump did exercise his powers in this case and leaked the existence of the wiretap, it could weaken his stance against the unauthorised leaks that have been a feature of his presidency so far.
Mr Trump has called sections of the media the "enemy of the American people" over their use of anonymous sources in stories revealing behind-the-scenes details of his administration.
He has repeatedly tweeted about his anger over "illegal leaks".
Previous efforts at suppressing leaks, by press secretary Sean Spicer and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, were themselves quickly leaked to reporters.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments