Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Donald Trump's health secretary vows Obamacare replacement will see 'no one worse off', despite fears

Independent analysis suggests the poor and elderly could lose out

Andrew Buncombe
New York
Sunday 12 March 2017 12:47 EDT
Comments
Mr Price has long been an opponent of Obamacare
Mr Price has long been an opponent of Obamacare (YouTube)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump’s health secretary has claimed “nobody will be worse off financially” under the Republicans’ healthcare plan, despite independent analysis that says millions could suffer.

Republicans last week unveiled proposed legislation to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare. Mr Trump has thrown his support behind the plan, despite complaints from hardliners that it provides people with too many “entitlements”.

The independent Kaiser Family Foundation said the bill will offer less help to Americans living in rural areas, the elderly and the poor. The Brookings Institute has projected the Congressional Budget Office will report that up to 15m fewer Americans will be covered under the Republican plan.

But on Sunday, health secretary Tom Price, a doctor who has long expressed a desire to scrap Obamacare, claimed those projections were incorrect.

“I firmly believe that nobody will be worse off financially in the process that we’re going through, understanding that they’ll have choices that they can select the kind of coverage that they want for themselves and for their family, not that the government forces them to buy,” he told NBC.

“So there’s cost that needs to come down, and we believe we’re going to be able to do that through this system. There's coverage that’s going to go up.”

Health Secretary points to smaller stack of paper to prove new healthcare bill is better than Obamacare

The Republican plan has for different reasons been criticised by both Democrats and conservative Republicans, with the latter terming it “Obamacare-lite”.

The American Medical Association, the US’s largest group representing doctors, said in a letter to Congress the new plan could hurt certain groups.

“While we agree that there are problems with the ACA that must be addressed, we cannot support the AHCA as drafted because of the expected decline in health insurance coverage and the potential harm it would cause to vulnerable patient populations,” it said.

The plan, formally called the American Health Care Act, has already advanced through key committees in the House of Representatives. Congressional Republicans and the White House reportedly wish to have it signed into law before Easter.

In the NBC interview, Mr Price described Obamacare as a “system that works for government or insurance” but not the American people.

“We need a system that works for people,” the former Georgia congressman said.

“I believe, and the president believes firmly, that if you create a system that’s accessible for everybody and you provide the financial feasibility for everybody to get coverage, that we have a great opportunity to increase coverage over where we are right now, as opposed to where the line is going right now where people are losing coverage and we’re going to have fewer individuals covered than we do currently.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in