Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Donald Trump says Susan Rice may have committed a crime, but fails to present evidence

The claims come amid two parallel Congressional investigations into the possible Russian ties of Mr Trump's associates 

Mythili Sampathkumar
New York
Wednesday 05 April 2017 13:22 EDT
Comments
President Donald Trump accused former National Security Adviser Susan Rice of committing a crime while she was in office
President Donald Trump accused former National Security Adviser Susan Rice of committing a crime while she was in office

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump said a former Obama administration official may have committed a crime, calling it "one of the big stories of our time", in an interview with the New York Times.

It is unclear what crime he believes Susan Rice, the former National Security Adviser, committed or what evidence, if any, Mr Trump has to back his claim.

It was revealed recently that Ms Rice, during her time as government official, requested names in intelligence documents detailing communications of the Trump transition team to be "unmasked", as she called it on MSNBC. These names are usually redacted or even given vague descriptors like 'Male 1'.

The Trump associates mentioned in the intelligence documents were not under surveillance themselves, but had been recorded while speaking with foreigners who were under surveillance by the US.

As US citizens, surveillance and spying on them is restricted but the foreigners were being observed under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the Americans speaking to them were caught under what is known as "incidental collection".

What Ms Rice did in asking for names of US citizens on the Trump transition team to be "unmasked" is different than actively spying on these individuals.

"Imagine if we saw something of grave significance about Russia, or China, or anybody else interfering with our political process,” she said to explain the unmasking.

Ms Rice has denied any wrongdoing, saying in an interview with MSNBC: "The allegations that somehow Obama administration officials utilised intelligence for political purposes are absolutely false."

Susan Hennessey, a former attorney for the National Security Agency and a fellow at the think tank Brookings Institution, tweeted: “What we're seeing here is US officials doing jobs to respond to what had markers of a counterintelligence threat: the Trump campaign.”

Mr Trump also previously accused former President Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower in New York during the 2016 campaign. It is unclear whether Mr Trump believes Ms Rice had anything to do with that accusation.

FBI Director James Comey testified before Congress that his agency had no evidence to support Mr Trump's accusation either.

Ms Rice was not asking for campaign team members' names to be "unmasked", but members of the transition team - the interim staff which assisted Mr Trump before he took office in January.

Several national security and intelligence experts have weighed in and, across the political spectrum, almost unanimously agree that Ms Rice did not commit a crime.

As Nada Bakos, a senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute and former CIA analyst, tweeted that Ms Rice was a National Security Advisor "reading a report of foreign officials discussing US persons coming into [the White House]. This isn't odd or wrong.”

Leaking any information Ms Rice learned from the documents would likely be considered a crime, however no public evidence is available to suggest she did that.

“I leaked nothing to nobody, and never have and never would,” Ms Rice said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in