Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Donald Trump Jr. gets a fact check dressing down from Pete Buttigieg – and Musk appears to approve

Variety of voices have questioned slow rollout of Biden administration priority of electric vehicle charging stations

Josh Marcus
San Francisco
Tuesday 26 November 2024 17:04 EST
Comments
Trump chooses Musk to lead DOGE department

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg took to X on Monday to fact-check misleading claims about the state of a Biden administration initiative to build more electric vehicle charges.

Earlier that day, Michael Rulli claimed that the federal government had spent $7.5bn to build eight electric vehicle charging stations, in what he called “evidence of squandering billions on something nobody wants, while millions struggle to afford the things they need.” The president-elect’s son, Donald Trump Jr., retweeted Rulli’s message, claiming the program “does not seem like a great return on investment...but hey he checked a woke box so it’s totally worth it.”

In response to the posts, Buttigieg said their information was “false.”

“To start with, $7.5B has not been spent, nor anything like that. That’s the entire program budget for the NEVI [National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure] program, which is to help build out a national charging network by 2030,” the official wrote in a thread.

“Secondly, there are chargers now operational in nine states (which does not mean 9 chargers, to be clear). These are only the first handful though. Most are to be built in the 2nd half of the decade,” he added. “Third, in this program the chargers are built by the states, not the federal government. And while it takes time to get a novel multi-billion dollar program going across 50 states, the states are on track.”

The exchange got the attention of Trump ally and EV manufacturer Elon Musk, who said Buttigieg’s information was “helpful to understand.”

Buttigieg said claims online about massive overspending on EV chargers were misleading
Buttigieg said claims online about massive overspending on EV chargers were misleading (AFP via Getty Images)

Despite the rebuttal from Buttigieg, conservatives aren’t the only ones concerned about the slow rollout of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law’s $7.5bn plan to spur EV charging stations.

As of March of this year, only seven stations in four states had been built.

“I think a lot of people who are watching this are getting concerned about the timeline,” Alexander Laska, deputy director for transportation and innovation at the center-left think tank Third Way toldThe Washington Post at the time.

The Department of Transportation has approved plans for further NEVI projects in all 50 states, according to its website.

The back-and-forth on X is also a reminder of Musk’s unique position within the incoming administration, which combines personal interest and public policy.

Musk, as head of the Trump administration’s non-governmental DOGE commission on cutting government spending, could have enormous influence over the federal budget, which currently provides contracts and subsidies to Musk enterprises like SpaceX and Tesla.

The world’s richest person, despite publicly boasting that Tesla didn’t need the subsidies, recently railed against a California plan to restart consumer EV tax credits if Trump follows through on an expected move to cut them, instituting a state policy that might not include Tesla.

The billionaire called the proposal “insane.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in