Donald Trump’s lawyers claim he should be immune from a defamation lawsuit because he is President
Summer Zervos, a former contestant from The Apprentice, has accused Mr Trump of sexual assault
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump’s lawyers have claimed he should be immune from a defamation lawsuit because he is the President.
Summer Zervos, a former contestant on The Apprentice, has accused Mr Trump of sexual assault.
Claiming Mr Trump tried to kiss and grope her in a hotel room in Beverly Hills in 2007, she filed a legal petition against the US leader days before his inauguration ceremony in January.
She filed a defamation claim and demanded the president “vindicate her reputation” by admitting the allegations.
Ms Zervos has claimed she would be willing to dismiss her case immediately if he retracts his “false and defamatory statements”.
Mr Trump's attorney Marc Kasowitz said he intends to file a motion to dismiss the complaint or halt the litigation until the end of his presidency.
He said the US Constitution "immunizes the President from being sued in state court while in office."
It is unclear whether this is the case, as the US Supreme Court has ruled that presidents are “absolutely immune from civil damage lawsuits” for conduct within the “outer perimeter” of their official responsibilities.
These responsibilities were defined in 1997 when the court explicitly ruled that executive immunity does protect against defamation claims, following a case involving claims made by former Arkansas state employee Paula Jones and the then President, Bill Clinton.
However, that case was allowed to proceed because those allegations concerned personal, private conduct.
The justices did however advise due to the burdens of the presidency that immunity questions “should be decided at the earliest possible stage of the litigation”.
Mr Trump has denied Ms Zevros’s allegations and took to Twitter to say they were "100% fabricated and made-up charges”,“totally false” and “totally made up nonsense.”
Her attorney Gloria Allred said Mr. Trump’s lawyers are wrong.
“Summer seeks vindication of her rights and reputation,” she said in a statement, adding that the Supreme Court had made it clear “that no man is above the law and that includes the President of the United States.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.