Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Judge dismisses wrongful death claim against Trump in Capitol officer lawsuit

Washington DC judge says Brian Sicknick’s partner lacks ‘statutory standing’ to sue Trump

Shweta Sharma
Wednesday 03 January 2024 00:10 EST
Comments
New videos show attack on police officer Brian Sicknick during Capitol riot

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A federal judge has dismissed part of a lawsuit against Donald Trump brought by the partner of Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick, who died a day after being attacked by rioters during the 6 January 2021 insurrection.

US District Court Judge Amit Mehta on Tuesday ruled that Sicknick’s partner, Sandra Garza, lacked “statutory standing” to file a claim against Mr Trump as she was not his spouse or domestic partner under Washington DC law.

“[Garza’s] contention that a ‘domestic partnership’ was established simply by Officer Sicknick having identified Garza as his ‘domestic partner’ in his will finds no basis in the plain text of the statute,” Mr Mehta wrote. “Garza therefore cannot recover the damages she personally seeks under the Act.”

But the judge permitted other parts of the lawsuit on two counts in his split decision, including the allegation that the former president and two men, Julian Khater and George Tanios, who were accused of attacking the officer, were engaged in a conspiracy to “violate civil rights”.

The judge also dismissed the wrongful death claim in the lawsuit against the two men.

But he rejected Mr Trump’s claim of immunity in this case, pointing out that the DC Circuit Court of Appeals has previously determined that he lacks presidential immunity regarding lawsuits related to his actions during the riots.

An attorney for Ms Garza said they were pleased with the judgement and considering the next steps.

Sandra Garza, the long-time partner of fallen Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, center, as a video of the Jan 6 attack on the US Capitol is played during a public hearing of the House select committee investigating the attack is held on Capitol Hill
Sandra Garza, the long-time partner of fallen Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, center, as a video of the Jan 6 attack on the US Capitol is played during a public hearing of the House select committee investigating the attack is held on Capitol Hill (Copyright 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved)

“We are pleased to see that our lawsuit in pursuit of justice for the late Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick, who died in the aftermath of the January 6 insurrection, has been permitted to continue. We are now considering our next step options, to include deposing former President Trump,” Mark S Zaid, one of the attorneys, said.

Ms Garza filed the lawsuit against Mr Trump and two others, seeking $10m in damages from each defendant.

The police officer’s partner, who earlier said they both voted for Mr Trump in the election, said she “holds Donald Trump 100 per cent responsible for what happened on January 6 and all of the people that have enabled him, enabled him that day, and continue to enable him now”.

Following Sicknick’s death, a medical examiner said that the officer, who died a day after the riots, had suffered two strokes caused by a blood clot at the base of the brain stem.

The autopsy said he died of natural causes and found no evidence that he suffered any reaction to sprays used by the two rioters named in the lawsuit.

Charles Sicknick, the father of fallen US Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick
Charles Sicknick, the father of fallen US Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick (Copyright 2023 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.)

Khater admitted to spraying Sicknick with a chemical irritant and pleaded guilty to two counts of assaulting the officer. He was sentenced to 80 months in prison.

Tanios admitted to buying the spray and pleaded guilty on two lesser misdemeanor counts and was sentenced to time served.

In his judgment, Mr Mehta said that he didn’t have to determine whether Ms Garza adequately claimed that Khater caused officer Sicknick’s death. This is because “at a minimum, Officer Sicknick’s estate can recover for any pain and suffering that he experienced before his death, and the complaint sufficiently pleads that Khater’s actions caused such harm”, he said.

Ms Garza, however, took issue with anyone claiming that the police officer’s death was unrelated to the tragic events that unfolded almost exactly a year ago in the nation’s capital.

“Brian was running from one end of the Capitol to the other end of the Capitol. He was exerting himself. And he was attacked,” she said in an interview last year to PBS. “All of those factors combined, and being highly stressed, producing a lot of adrenaline and cortisol in the body... [he was] worrying about his colleagues, as well as himself.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in