Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US Border Patrol 'will need years' to satisfy Donald Trump's order for 5,000 more agents

The agency says it will not lower standards to meet the quota, which represents a 25 per cent growth in headcount

Alicia Caldwell,Elliot Spagat
Thursday 16 March 2017 04:28 EDT
Comments
A US Customs and Border Protection agent
A US Customs and Border Protection agent (REUTERS)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The US Border Patrol will not be able to hit President Donald Trump's target of hiring 5,000 new agents for years to come—and it is unclear whether Congress will provide enough money to recruit them.

A precise timeline has not been set and standards will not be lowered, according to administration officials, but one said the goal was to hire as many agents as possible in four or five years. Another official said it would not happen overnight.

Officials at US Customs and Border Protection, the Border Patrol's parent agency, would speak only on condition of anonymity, despite Mr Trump's insistence that reporters should only quote people by name.

The hiring surge is a key piece of Mr Trump's immigration orders that has drawn less attention than his travel ban and his plan to erect a wall on the border with Mexico.

Hiring 5,000 Border Patrol agents would represent an increase of about 25 percent, and his plan for 10,000 more Immigration and Customs and Enforcement officers and agents is an increase of about 50 percent.

Mr Trump's orders set no deadline and it is unclear if Congress will provide the billions of dollars they would likely require. Mr Trump proposed the target of 5,000 agents during the campaign; CBP officials did not directly address how that number came about Wednesday but said it was achievable.

A CBP official said the agency was committed to a requirement that all applicants take a lie detector test but was looking to waive it for a limited number of job seekers, including certain veterans with at least four years of military experience and some law enforcement officers at other federal agencies.

The officials said about 75 percent of applicants fail the polygraph, roughly two-thirds of them for admissions about criminal history or other matters.

That is more than double the average rate of applicants at eight law enforcement agencies that provided data to The Associated Press under open-records requests. Applicants to the US Drug Enforcement Administration failed 36 percent in the last two years.

CBP also plans to test an alternative polygraph that may take less time to administer but still meets federal standards and identifies problem candidates, the officials said.

ICE, which is responsible for deportations and immigrant detention centres, does not require that applicants take a lie detector test.

One official challenged a widespread perception that the Border Patrol's last hiring surge, which doubled the number of agents from 2003 to 2011, resulted in more corruption. The official said there was no evidence to show that agents hired during that time were more corrupt.

AP

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in