Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Private banker to Trump and Jared Kushner under investigation by Deutsche Bank

Probe comes after multiple investigations into Trump family’s relationship with embattled bank

Andrew Naughtie
Monday 03 August 2020 08:08 EDT
Comments
Trump received more than $2bn in loans from Deutsche Bank despite being 'deemed untouchable' by other institutions, report claims

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Deutsche Bank has launched an internal investigation into a transaction between one of its bankers and a company part-owned by Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

According to The New York Times, the investigation centres around a $1.5m-apartment on Park Avenue bought by Trump family banker Rosemary Vrablic and two other Deutsche Bank staff members.

They bought the property from a company named Bergel 715, which a person familiar with Mr Kushner’s finances told the Times was part-owned by Mr Kushner at the time of the transaction.

If this account of the transaction proves accurate, it could mean that Ms Vrablic had violated a standard policy of not doing business with clients. A spokesman for Mr Kushner’s business, Kushner Companies, told the Times that his boss “has no involvement with the sales of the apartments” and that he “is not the managing partner” of Bergel 715.

The relationship between Deutsche Bank and the Trump family is close and complex. The bank has provided services to the family for many years despite Mr Trump’s long history of bankruptcy and defaults, and has kept him on as a client even after repeated allegations of improper conduct involving both parties.

The Trump family’s financial conduct has previously raised alarm at Deutsche Bank. Last year, it came to light that the bank’s money laundering team had flagged several suspicious transactions that set off automatic systems designed to detect illegal activity. The team allegedly recommended that the transactions be flagged with the US treasury, only to be rebuffed by senior executives.

At the time, Mr Trump attacked the reports as simply the work of a venal mainstream media, which he said has “never been as corrupt and deranged as it is today”. He also maintained that he “doesn’t need banks”. Kushner Companies, meanwhile, called the reports “completely made up and totally false”.

And even before Mr Trump became president, his relationship with Deutsche Bank fell under scrutiny thanks to his massive debts to the bank, which at the time was being fined by US regulators over its provision of toxic mortgages that played a role in the 2008 housing crash. There were concerns at the time that if elected, Mr Trump could intervene in the Deutsche Bank case with a view to protecting his own companies.

The family’s relationship with the bank later became a subject to the Mueller investigation. The special counsel specifically focused on a $285m loan that Deutsche Bank granted Mr Kushner’s company only a month before Mr Trump was elected – and just as the bank was settling with state prosecutors over charges it had aided in a Russian money-laundering scheme.

Today, the bank is fighting off subpoenas for various of Mr Trump’s financial records, in particular his tax returns. The president sued to prevent his records from being turned over, but the Supreme Court ultimately ruled 7-2 that presidents are not immune from criminal investigation.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in