Federal judge declares DACA ‘illegal’ and blocks new applications
Decision does not revoke legal status for thousands of ‘dreamers’, though legal battle to continue
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A federal judge has blocked new applications to a programme that has shielded thousands of young migrants from deportation after they arrived in the US as children, but the decision will not impact the status of people have already been admitted.
Though the latest decision against the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) programme does not revoke their legal status, it continues a legal limbo for immigrant “dreamers” and their families who have lived in the country for years, with legal protections extending from the 2012 policy under then-president Barack Obama.
US District Judge Andrew Hanen, who was appointed by George W Bush, ruled that the former president had overstepped his executive authority and “illegally implemented” a programme that has granted protections to roughly 650,000 people.
The decision follows a lawsuit from Republican officials in Texas and several other states who have sought to argue that immigrants have over-burdened their social safety nets and other costs.
But the judge did not upend DACA entirely, keeping it in place for existing dreamers in noting that the decade-long programme has become a part of the fabric of many communities.
“Hundreds of thousands of individual DACA recipients, along with their employers, states, and loved ones, have come to rely on the DACA program,” he wrote in his ruling.
“Given those interests, it is not equitable for a government program that has engendered such a significant reliance to terminate suddenly,” he said. “This consideration, along with the government’s assertion that it is ready and willing to try to remedy the legal defects of the DACA program indicates that equity will not be served by a complete and immediate cessation of DACA.”
Donald Trump had previously tried to revoke the programme, but the US Supreme Court ruled against his administration and a New York judge ordered him to restore it in December.
The decision will likely spur Congress into legislative action, with a White House-backed measure that proposes a sweeping set of reforms with an eight-year path to citizenship that could impact 11 million immigrants.
Roughly 254,000 children in the US have at least one parent granted DACA protections, according to the Center for American Progress.
The organisation’s acting vice president of immigration policy, Philip E Wolgin called the decsion “cruel, unnecessary, and belies the many contributions that DACA recipients are making to the country at a critical time.”
The Coalition for the American Dream, a group of 100 large employers and trade associations, said the ruling “only reinforces the critical message that Congress must act.”
“DACA recipients have been critical members of our workforce, industries, and communities for years now,” the group said. “Their work and commitment to our companies, their families and communities are critical to our nation’s strength, especially since there are tens of thousands of DACA recipients working as front line doctors and nurses and in other critical industries fighting Covid-19.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments