Creationist allowed to chisel away at Grand Canyon under Trump's new religious freedom order
The geologist believes the Grand Canyon was created by 'catastrophic erosion' after a great biblical flood
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An Australian creationist has received permission to collect rocks from the Grand Canyon in an attempt to prove the occurance of a great biblical flood - thanks in part a recent executive order from Donald Trump.
The National Parks service recently approved an application from Andrew Snelling, a certified geologist and evangelical Christian, which will allow him to collect “50 or 60” fist-sized rocks from the Grand Canyon.
Mr Snelling said the samples will serve his work of "investigating geological phenomena from the perspective of one who believes in the truth of the Old and the New Testaments”.
The National Parks Service had initially declined the application, claiming his application lacked scientific merit.
But the scientist sued for religious discrimination, citing a recent executive order from Mr Trump. The order directs federal agencies to “respect and protect the freedom of persons and organisations to engage in religious and political speech”.
Mr Snelling is a young-Earth creationist – a small religious subset that believes the earth was created by God only a few thousand years ago.
The scientist believes the Grand Canyon is not a result of billions of years of erosion, but of a “catastrophic erosion” event after Noah’s flood.
In considering Mr Snelling’s proposal, the Park Service consulted three mainstream geologists. All three said his work was not scientifically valid and one pointed out that the rocks could also be found outside the canyon.
"My overall conclusion is that Dr. Snelling has no scientific track record and no scientific affiliation since 1982," wrote Karl Karlstrom, a geologist at the University of New Mexico.
The Parks Service also noted that Mr Snelling's proposed sampling method – a hammer and chisel – would "permanently visibly mar the geological structures themselves".
But lawyers for the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a Christian legal advocacy group who filed the lawsuit on Mr Snelling’s behalf, maintained that this was a case of religious discrimination.
“This case perfectly illustrates why President Trump had to order executive agencies to affirm religious freedom, because Park officials specifically targeted Dr. Snelling’s religious faith as the reason to stop his research,” ADF lawyer Gary McCaleb said.
The Parks Service has now agreed to let Mr Snelling proceed with his research, so long as he meets with “experienced staff” to discuss sampling locations and "appropriate sampling methodology".
He said: "I am gratified that the Grand Canyon research staff have recognised the quality and integrity of my proposed research project and issued the desired research permits so that I can collect rock samples in the park, perform the planned testing of them, and openly report the results for the benefit of all."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments