Cowboys for Trump founder abandons plan to ride horse to Capitol riot trial to avoid ‘spectacle’
An elected official from New Mexico is set to be the second person tried on charges stemming from the U.S. Capitol riot
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The founder of Cowboys for Trump abandoned his plan to ride a horse to court for his trial on charges that he illegally entered the US Capitol grounds on the day a pro-Trump mob disrupted the certification of Joe Biden's presidential election victory.
Instead, Otero County Commissioner Couy Griffin arrived at US District Court in Washington DC on Monday on foot, dressed in a stetson and suit, after driving into the capital with a horse-trailer on the back of his truck.
The elected official from New Mexico told NBC News reporter Ryan J Reilly he chose not to ride the horse in out of respect for the court and to avoid creating a “spectacle”. He said he would consider saddling up at the conclusion of the case, depending on its result.
That's not the only unusual feature of the case against Mr Griffin, whose trial will be the second among the hundreds of people charged with federal crimes related to the 6 January 2021 siege.
Mr Griffin is one of the few riot defendants who isn't accused of entering the Capitol or engaging in any violent or destructive behavior. He claims he has been selectively prosecuted for his political views.
‘I’ve had my own family say some pretty nasty things’: Trump cowboy Couy Griffin faces uncertain political future
‘Cowboys for Trump’ leader Couy Griffin arrested after saying he would return to Washington armed for Biden inauguration
Who is Guy Wesley Reffitt, the first Capitol rioter convicted at jury trial after threatening to kill family?
Mr Griffin, one of three members of the Otero County Commission in southern New Mexico, is among a handful of riot defendants who either held public office or ran for a government leadership post in the 2 1/2 years before the attack.
He is among only three riot defendants who have asked for a bench trial, which means a judge, not a jury, will decide his case. US District Court Judge Trevor McFadden is scheduled to hear one day of testimony.
Mr Griffin, a former rodeo rider and former pastor, helped found a political committee called Cowboys for Trump. In a court filing, prosecutors called him "an inflammatory provocateur and fabulist who engages in racist invective and propounds baseless conspiracy theories, including that Communist China stole the 2020 Presidential Election."
Mr Griffin's attorneys, David Smith and Nicholas Smith, say hundreds if not thousands of other people did exactly what Griffin did on 6 January and haven't been charged with any crimes.
“The evidence will show that the government selected Griffin for prosecution based on the fact that he gave a speech and led a prayer at the Capitol, that is, selected him based on protected expression,” they wrote.
More than 770 people have been charged with federal crimes related to the Capitol riot. More than 230 riot defendants have pleaded guilty, mostly to misdemeanors, and at least 127 of them have been sentenced. Approximately 100 others have trial dates.
Earlier this month, a jury convicted a Texas man, Guy Wesley Reffitt, of storming the Capitol with a holstered handgun in the first trial for a Capitol riot defendant. Jurors also convicted him of obstructing Congress from certifying the Electoral College vote on 6 January of interfering with police officers who were guarding the Capitol and of threatening his two teenage children if they reported him to law enforcement.
Mr Reffitt's conviction on all charges could give prosecutors more leverage in negotiating plea deals in many other cases or discourage other defendants from going to trial. The outcome of Griffin's trial also could have a ripple effect, helping others to decide whether to let a judge or a jury decide their case.
Mr Griffin, 48, is charged with two misdemeanors: entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds and disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds.
Mr Griffin was joined in Washington by Matthew Struck, who served as his videographer. In a video taken in a parking lot outside the Capitol on 5 January, Mr Griffin said he came to Washington for “possibly the most historic day for our country in my lifetime” and trusted that Vice PresidentMike Pence would "do the right thing.”
After attending President Donald Trump's “Stop the Steal” rally on 6 January, Mr Griffin and Mr Struck walked over barriers and up a staircase to enter a stage that was under construction on the Capitol's Lower West Terrace for Biden’s inauguration, according to prosecutors.
Mr Struck is listed as one of three government witnesses. He has an immunity deal with prosecutors for his testimony.
“At trial, the government expects Matthew Struck’s testimony and videos will provide a precise picture of the defendant’s actions and his intentions,” prosecutors wrote.
Prosecutors also intend to call a Capitol police inspector and a US Secret Service inspector.
Prosecutors want to use Mr Griffin's own words against him. They plan to play video recordings of his statements and actions in Washington.
After climbing over a stone wall and entering a restricted area outside the Capitol, Mr Griffin said, “This is our house … we should all be armed,” according to prosecutors. He called it “a great day for America” and added, “The people are showing that they have had enough,” prosecutors said.
A key question in Mr Griffin's case is whether he entered a restricted area while Pence was still present on Capitol grounds, a prerequisite for the US Secret Service to invoke access restrictions. Mr Griffin's attorneys say Pence had already departed the Capitol before the earliest that Griffin could have entered a restricted area.
“The Government responds that the Vice President’s precise location ultimately doesn’t matter,” the judge wrote in an order issued on Friday. “Perhaps, although the lack of clarity about the metes and bounds of the restricted area and the Vice President’s movements on January 6th undermine this argument.”
Mr Griffin's lawyers also say the government can't prove that Mr Griffin engaged in any disorderly or disruptive conduct.
“To the contrary, it will see that Griffin peacefully led a prayer on the Capitol steps," they wrote. “It will see that the members of the crowd listening to Griffin were calmed and pacified compared to protesters around them.”
___
Associated Press writer Jacques Billeaud in Phoenix contributed to this report.