'I'm a social scientist': Trump's trade adviser claims he's qualified to refute Anthony Fauci's coronavirus advice
Peter Navarro reportedly spars with top White House health official over controversial drug that president claims can successfully treat Covid-19 patients
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump's economic adviser claims he is qualified to measure the effectiveness of an anti-malarial drug against the novel coronavirus because he is a "social scientist" despite not having a degree in medicine.
Peter Navarro told CNN on Monday that he understands "how to read statistical studies, whether it's in medicine, the law, economics or whatever".
He has a master's degree in public administration and a PhD in economics. He does not have a background in public health or medicine.
Asked why he believes he's more qualified to talk about the controversial drug hydroxychloroquine than Dr Anthony Fauci, the top doctor leading the White House coronavirus task force response, Mr Navarro said: "Doctors disagree with things all the time."
Dr Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has repeatedly clarified that early reports of the drug's use against Covid-19 are anecdotal and not clinically proven to combat the virus.
Mr Navarro said he is relying on the president's "intuition" to determine the drug's efficacy, from "all the doctors I've talked to and all the scientific papers I've read."
His statements follow reports that he had clashed with White House officials while insisting that hydroxychloroquine — which has been used to treat malaria, lupus and rheumatoid arthritis — should also be used to treat coronavirus patients, and reportedly lashed out at Dr Fauci about the drug's efficacy, as reported by Axios.
The president has pressed for doctors to use the drug to treat their patients, despite his own health officials contradicting his claims. At a White House briefing on Sunday, the president refused to allow Dr Fauci to answer questions about the drug.
In March, the federal Food and Drug Administration issued an emergency authorisation to distribute the drug from a national stockpile, but made clear that the two drugs -- chloroquine phosphate and hydroxychloroquine sulfate -- are not approved by the agency for Covid-19 treatment.
The US Department of Health and Human Services has also stressed that despite anecdotal reports, the drug still requires clinical trials "to provide scientific evidence that these treatments are effective" against the virus.
In March, an Arizona man died and his wife was in critical condition after they ingested chloroquine phosphate, commonly found in fish tank cleaners.
She told NBC that the president said the chemical "was pretty much a cure."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments