Clarence Thomas criticizes judges for veering into politics
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is criticizing some in the judiciary for veering into the role of legislators and politicians
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Thursday criticized some in the judiciary for veering into the role of legislators and politicians, saying it is not the role of judges to make policy or to base decisions on their personal feelings or religious beliefs.
Speaking at the University of Notre Dame, Thomas said judges “venturing into areas we should not have entered into” is part of why the nomination process, particularly for federal judges with lifetime appointments like himself, is so contentious.
“The court was thought to be the least dangerous branch and we may have become the most dangerous,” Thomas said. "And I think that’s problematic.”
He did not cite any specific examples.
Thomas is the most senior justice on a court that grew more conservative under President Donald Trump who placed three justices on the court.
The speech at a Catholic university by Thomas, a Catholic, was delivered one week after he was among the majority in the Supreme Court's 5-4 vote to deny an emergency appeal of a new Texas law banning most abortions. The court suggested it was not their last word on the matter. The law is the biggest restriction of abortion rights since the court's landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that women have a constitutional right to abortion, and supporters of abortion rights say it's evidence Roe v. Wade could be threatened.
The Catholic church opposes abortion. Asked Thursday if there have been times when he had to resolve legal questions that conflict with his Catholic faith, Thomas said it has not been a problem for him. He said some cases were very hard, particularly early on in his career, but added “that's not the role of a judge.”
"You do your job and you go cry alone," he said.
Thomas was accused of sexual harassment by former employee Anita Hill during his own bruising 1991 confirmation hearing — charges he denied.
On Thursday, he said “the craziness” during his confirmation was the result of the politicization of the judiciary, saying “it was absolutely about abortion, a matter I had not thought deeply about at the time.”
At one point during the lecture three protesters stood and yelled “I still believe Anita Hill.” They were escorted out of the auditorium without incident; the crowd then stood and applauded.
Thursday’s lecture was a rare public speech by Thomas, who typically shies away from public speaking and is known for going years without asking questions during arguments before the Supreme Court, unlike his colleagues.
Thomas acknowledged his reticence, telling the crowd that years ago the late Justice Antonin Scalia a fellow conservative, “told me I should get out on the road and fly the flag.”
“He was more of an extrovert than I am,” Thomas said. “I’m quite content not to get out on the road.”