Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Chelsea Clinton rubbishes Trump's claim she would have sat in for her mother at G20 amid Ivanka row

The President has claimed the move was 'very standard'

Andrew Buncombe
New York
Monday 10 July 2017 11:33 EDT
Comments
Ms Clinton frequently appeared with her mother during the 2016 campaign
Ms Clinton frequently appeared with her mother during the 2016 campaign (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Chelsea Clinton has dismissed Donald Trump’s defence of his controversial decision to have his daughter sit in for him at G20 meeting by suggesting Hillary Clinton might have done the same.

The President triggered fresh outcry after images emerged of Ivanka Trump sitting at a G20 meeting in Hamburg. The photograph - tweeted and then deleted by Russian official Svetlana Lukash - showed Mr Trump’s eldest daughter seated beside British Prime Minister Theresa May and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Mr Trump has said there was nothing wrong with his daughter briefly replaching him, and cited a comment by German Chancellor Angela Merkel who said it was not an issue because “it’s very well known that she works at the White House”.

On Monday morning, Mr Trump tweeted: “If Chelsea Clinton were asked to hold the seat for her mother, as her mother gave our country away, the Fake News would say CHELSEA FOR PRES!”

Ms Clinton, 37, who was a regular presence during her mother’s presidential campaign last year, quickly responded to Mr Trump’s comments.

“Good morning Mr. President. It would never have occurred to my mother or my father to ask me,” she wrote on Twitter. “Were you giving our country away? Hoping not.”

Ivanka Trump plays significant role standing in for Donald Trump at G20

The meeting that Mr Trump’s daughter briefly sat in for him, was a closed-door session on African development.

Her presence there sparked incredulity and anger, with many people commenting on social media that Mr Trump was behaving like a dictator.

Thomas Bernes, a fellow at Ontario’s Centre for International Governance and a former IMF official, told The Independent the decision by Mr Trump suggested to other world leaders a lack of seriousness and commitment.

“[The countries] will not be looking to the US for leadership - they will be looking to Trudeau, Macron and Merkel,” he said.

Mr Trump claimed the arrangement was “very standard”. Nikki Haley, the US Ambassador to the United Nations, also defended Ms Trump, saying the President’s daughter had previously sat in on meetings with her and Mr Trump, especially those relating to women and business, Reuters said.

Lawrence Summers, a former World Bank official and economic adviser under former Democratic president Barack Obama, said was rare for government heads to leave during major summits.

He said if they did so, that foreign ministers or other very senior government officials would usually step it.

“There is no precedent for a head of government’s adult child taking a seat,” he wrote in the Washington Post. “There is no precedent for good reason. It was insulting to the others present and sent a signal of disempowerment regarding senior government officials.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in