Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh once questioned whether abortion rights were ‘settled law of the land’

Judge says he was referring to views of other legal scholars

Emily Shugerman
New York
Thursday 06 September 2018 13:07 EDT
Comments
Judge Brett Kavanaugh answers questions during the second day of his Supreme Court confirmation hearing
Judge Brett Kavanaugh answers questions during the second day of his Supreme Court confirmation hearing (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

US Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh once questioned whether the landmark decision affirming women's right to abortion access was the “settled law of the land,” according to leaked emails.

Mr Kavanaugh, Donald Trump’s pick to replace retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court, questioned the underpinnings of the case – Roe v Wade – as a lawyer for former President George W Bush’s White House.

His comments came in an email suggesting changes to an op-ed article that read, in part: “It is widely accepted by legal scholars across the board that Roe v Wade and its progeny are the settled law of the land”.

“I am not sure that all legal scholars refer to Roe as the settled law of the land at the Supreme Court level since Court can always overrule its precedent, and three current Justices on the Court would do so,” Mr Kavanaugh wrote in response, according to emails obtained by the New York Times.

Mr Kavanaugh's opinion on Roe v Wade has been one of the defining issues of his confirmation hearing, as women’s rights advocates fear the conservative judge could tip the balance of the court against the landmark 1973 ruling.

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh delivers opening statement

Mr Kavanaugh has so far refused to say whether he would support overturning the decision, saying only that it is an “important precedent” that has been reaffirmed many times.

The judge was similarly evasive when Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein questioned him about the emails during his hearing on Thursday, saying he was only referring to the views of other legal scholars.

"I think [the op-ed] was overstating something about legal scholars, and I’m always concerned about accuracy," Mr Kavanaugh said.

The email was met with outcry from women’s rights organisations – many of which have been organising against the nominee for months, out of fear that he would threaten reproductive rights.

"Donald Trump promised to nominate anti-choice justices. These documents show that he fulfilled that promise. Brett Kavanaugh is a clear threat to Roe v Wade,” said Stephanie Schriock, president of women’s political organisation EMILY's List, in a statement.

Others were more concerned that the email, and hundreds like it, were being kept from the general public. A lawyer for the Bush administration turned over thousands of Mr Kavanaugh’s emails on Monday, but deemed them “committee confidential,” meaning they could not be published or even discussed during the confirmation hearing.

“It’s documents like these that show who Brett Kavanaugh really is. The fact Senate majority leaders are refusing to release this info is astounding,” Planned Parenthood Action Fund tweeted. “The public deserves transparency.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in