Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Biden accused of ‘locking the door’ on ‘diversity’ visa applicants after partially rescinding Trump’s ‘Muslim ban’

‘This is unacceptable,’ says progressive Democrat Ayanna Pressley

Gino Spocchia
Wednesday 10 March 2021 10:05 EST
Comments
Donald Trump announces a ban on refugees and all visitors from Muslim-majority countries

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

President Joe Biden has been accused of “locking the door” on thousands of visa applicants who were denied entry by Donald Trump’s so-called ‘Muslim’ ban, following partial rescinding the order in recent days.

It comes after visa applicants from more than dozen predominantly Muslim countries banned from applying for visas by the former president were invited to do so on Monday.

But in rescinding the ban, which the US president previously called "a stain on our national conscience”, thousands of applicants who were selected to receive "diversity visas" were excluded.

Civil liberties campaigners said the decision to block those who were due to receive US visas from underrepresented countries – as designated by the diversity visa allocation process – amounted to “locking the door” to them.

One of several groups to challenge the former ban, The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), added that the Biden administration's decision was a failure that furthered the former president’s discrimination.

Read more:AOC joins backlash over Biden child migrant camp: ‘This is not okay’

“President Biden just dusted off Trump’s ‘CLOSED’ sign and locked the door behind him,” said ACLU attorney Manar Waheed in a statement.

“This decision threatens to forever prevent thousands of Black and Brown immigrants who meet all of the legal requirements to immigrate to the United States from doing so, perpetuating the effects of the discriminatory ban,” said Mr Waheed.

He added that “although Biden made the Muslim ban recession a day one priority, that alone is not enough. Today, he cemented Trump’s legacy of harm.”

The ACLU statement was then shared to Twitter by Ayanna Pressley, the progressive Democratic congresswoman, who wrote: “So the cycle of harm must be broken. This is unacceptable.”

A spokesperson for the State Department told ABC News that those who applied for diversity visas during 2017-2020 will be allowed to reapply, which requires another payment fee.

Diversity visas are capped at 55,000 per year, creating a problem for the State Department in regards to the former ban. Applicants are also supposed to show proof of their status from the same financial year in which they apply.

According to the State Department, as many as 41,000 people were denied entry into the United States due to the Trump-era ban. The Biden administration, meanwhile, has promised to show more compassion to migrants and refugees.

The State Department confirmed to The Independent that diversity visa applicants between 2017-2020 are “statutorily barred from being issued visas based on their selection as Diversity Visa applicants in those fiscal years, as the deadlines for visa issuance in those fiscal years have expired.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in