Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Steve Bannon’s lawyer asks to be removed from contempt case because he may be a witness

Former Trump White House adviser Steve Bannon goes on trial for criminal contempt of Congress next month

Andrew Feinberg
Washington, DC
Friday 08 July 2022 11:20 EDT
Comments
Steve Bannon Unable to Shirk Charges, Rants On Courthouse Steps About MAGA Ruling the U.S. For ‘100 Years’

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One of the attorneys representing former Trump White House adviser Steve Bannon in the criminal contempt of Congress case against him is asking to be released from service as Mr Bannon’s lawyer, because he may be called to testify at the upcoming trial.

Mr Bannon, a former naval officer and conservative media executive who chaired former president Donald Trump 2016 campaign, is set to face trial next month on charges that he wilfully defied subpoenas for documents and testimony issued to him by the House January 6 select committee.

In a four-page motion filed before US District Judge Carl Nichols, attorney Robert Costello said the fact that he is “the only individual” who interacted with the committee on Mr Bannon’s behalf and his status as Mr Bannon’s “sole basis of information about the facts and the law concerning this matter,” there has “always been the possibility that [he] might be called as a witness in this matter”.

Mr Costello noted that Judge Nichols has not yet decided whether to permit him to testify, and said if he does not, “there will be no pathway to inform the Jury about the communications with the Select Committee” or prosecutors, who he goes on to accuse of “[interfering] with Mr Bannon’s attorney-client relationship by attempting to turn [him into a witness against [his] client by surreptitiously subpoenaing [his] home, office direct line and cellphone records while at the same time failing in their attempts to obtain [his] social media information”.

The accusations in question stem from two meetings Mr Costello had with Department of Justice officials in October 2021 with the aim of persuading them not to charge Mr Bannon with contempt after the House of Representatives voted to refer Mr Bannon’s refusal to comply with the select committee subpoena for prosecution.

Mr Costello unsuccessfully attempted to have the court exclude evidence of the meetings, at which he provided the FBI with evidence showing Mr Bannon had been informed that he could not refuse to comply with the subpoena on grounds that his testimony was shielded by executive privilege.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in