Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Assault weapons not protected by Second Amendment, US appeals court rules

'We have no power to extend Second Amendment protection to the weapons of war', wrote Maryland's Judge Robert King

Samuel Osborne
Wednesday 22 February 2017 06:04 EST
Comments
Maryland banned the AR-15 and other military-style rifles and shotguns and limited magazine capacity to 10 rounds in response to the massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012
Maryland banned the AR-15 and other military-style rifles and shotguns and limited magazine capacity to 10 rounds in response to the massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012 (PAUL J. RICHARDS/AFP/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Assault weapons are not protected under the Second Amendment of the US Constitution, a federal appeals court has ruled.

The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth circuit ruled 10-4 to uphold Maryland's ban on assault weapons, a law made in response to the massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012.

"Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protection to the weapons of war," Judge Robert King wrote, referring to the "military-style rifles" that were also used during mass shootings in Aurora, Colorado, San Bernardino, California, and Orlando, Florida.

These are "places whose names have become synonymous with the slaughters that occurred there," he added, noting the Supreme Court's decision in the 2008 District of Columbia v Heller case excluded coverage of assault weapons.

Senate hopeful rebuffs gun control criticism by assembling AR-15 blindfolded

The US has some of the most permissive gun rights in the world. After Congress became a graveyard for gun control legislation, some states enacted their own measures.

In total, seven states and the District of Colombia have laws banning semi-automatic rifles.

Four appeal courts have rejected Second Amendment challenges to bans on assault weapons and large-capacity magazines, Mr King wrote.

In 2015, US District Judge Catherine Blake upheld Maryland's law banning the AR-15 and other military-style rifles and shotguns and limiting magazine capacity to 10 rounds, but a smaller panel of circuit court judges reversed her ruling in 2016.

The case could be eventually be heard by the Supreme Court.

The majority "has gone to greater lengths than any other court to eviscerate the constitutionally guaranteed right to keep and bear arms," Judge William Traxler wrote in the dissent of the ruling.

Additional reporting by Reuters

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in