Amy Coney Barrett hearing: Republican who voted against both Obama nominees complains about partisan politics
Since joining the Senate in 2002, Cornyn has voted against both Supreme Court justices nominated by a Democratic president, citing their perceived liberal ‘judicial activism’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Texas Senator John Cornyn spent the first half of his opening remarks on Monday at a hearing for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett pining for the good ol’ days of Senate bipartisanship.
Mr Cornyn, like several other GOP senators, noted that the Senate confirmed the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, whose seat Ms Barrett would fill, by a bipartisan 96-3 vote. The conservative legal icon Antonin Scalia received 98 votes to the high court.
“Even the two justices who were once considered the ideological book-ends on the court received overwhelming support in the Senate,” Mr Cornyn said on Monday.
Harris blasts GOP for trying to repeal Obamacare through SCOTUS
Kamala Harris: Amy Coney Barrett could ‘undo RBG’s life’s work’
Senator Mike Lee, who tested positive for Covid, attends ACB hearing
Graham defends decision to advance Amy Coney Barrett nomination
Her words: Amy Coney Barrett on faith, precedent, abortion
“The Senate used to recognize that exceptional qualifications were all that was required for a seat on the court. … Justice Ginsburg said of her unlikely friendship with Justice Scalia, you can disagree, without being disagreeable,” he said.
But Mr Cornyn has not been part of that bipartisan tradition — and never was.
Since joining the Senate in 2002, the Texas Republican has voted against both Supreme Court justices nominated by a Democratic president, citing their perceived liberal “judicial activism.”
He voted against Sonia Sotomayor in 2009 and Elena Kagan in 2010, both of whom were selected to the bench by then-President Barack Obama.
Mr Cornyn later harangued his Democratic colleagues for how they treated Justice Brett Kavanaugh at his confirmation hearings in 2018. Mr Kavanaugh was accused of sexually assaulting a woman, Christine Blasey Ford, when the two were in high school.
The GOP has said the arguments against Mr Kavanaugh were spurious at best, and a political hit job at worst.
“What our colleagues on the other side of the aisle put Justice Kavanaugh through two years ago was an absolute disgrace and hopefully a low point for the Senate,” Mr Cornyn said.
“They and some of their allies sought to destroy the personal character of a good man with innuendo, misinformation, and outright lies. I hope they resist the temptation to repeat that during this hearing,” he said.
Ms Ford’s story was never substantiated, but neither was it discredited wholesale.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments